

English Premier League to Grow Their Own
By: Daryl | September 16th, 2009
There’s a bit of a shakeup happening in the world of football right now, with more than one organization taking steps to self-correct the problems they’ve (more than likely) caused.
First there was Europe’s big spending clubs approving the Michel Platinin-led plan to only spend what they earn. No debt, no sugar daddies from 2012 onwards.
And now English clubs – which notably feature fewer English players than they used to – have agreed to a self-imposed “homegrown player quota”.
Starting next season (2010-11) English clubs must submit a squad list (or roster) of 25 players, eight of whom must be “homegrown”.
Homegrown doesn’t necessarily mean English. It just means that the player spent three seasons with an English league club prior to their 21st birthday. Here’s how the Prem’s website puts it:
A home-grown player will be defined as one who, irrespective of his nationality or age, has been registered with any club affiliated to the Football Association or the Football Association of Wales for a period, continuous or not, of three entire seasons or 36 months prior to his 21st birthday (or the end of the Season during which he turns 21).
So Cristiano Ronaldo (who joined Man Utd aged 18 in 2003 and so was with an English clubs for three seasons before he turned 21) and Cesc Fabregas (with Arsenal since age 16) are considered just as homegrown as Steven Gerrard or Ashley Cole.
This doesn’t necessarily discriminate against foreigners, but does force teams to pick players who’ve spent their careers in England, which for the most part will be English kids.
The bigger upheaval may be the squad size of 25. Especially for teams like Liverpool, whose current first team squad is considerably bigger right now. But 25 isn’t a hard limit, as the club can still call on as many players aged under-21 as it likes.
I see ups and downs to this.
I see clubs being forced to use their young players in the first team more regularly. As a neutral football fan, that could be quite exciting, as everyone likes to see the next generation of superstars as soon as possible. As an England fan it makes me optimistic that more young English players will get a chance, as their path to first team football won’t be blocked by ageing foreigners.
On the downside… this could lead to either a) a drop in quality as clubs are forced to field players that aren’t quite read, or b) the existing problem of English teams going around poaching buying up all the young talent (Rafael at Man Utd and (famously) Gael Kakuta at Chelsea) going into overdrive.
Either way, should make for an interesting summer of transfer activity as teams get ready for the rule change.
![]() |
Soccer Forums | Team/International Results | |||
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



How was Rafael poached in any way?
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



You’re right Martin, he wasn’t. Poaching was the wrong word to use because it implies stealing. What I really meant was the concept of English teams buying young talent from foreign leagues at a very early age.
Posted from
United States

-



What people aren’t really noticing is that this rule won’t affect the top clubs one iota — they all already have to abide by more restrictive roster rules for European competition.
Posted from
United States

-



Wait, why is there a fleet of buses from England heading across the Chunnel towards Italy carrying diapers and pacifiers?
Oh that’s right, “homegrown” talent.
Maybe they might actually pay the clubs for the talent they take this time…. naaaaaaaaah who am I kidding.
The Scourge of European Football pays for nothing. But boy do they get upset when people use the word “steal”…
Posted from
United States

-



That’s definitely true mylons, and from what I learned playing Football Manager, the UEFA squad rules are pretty similar.
But I think when these restrictions are applied over the long course of a domestic season, it has the potential to be more impactful than in the Champions League. Especially because you can leave someone out of the CL squad and they can still play league football, but if there’s a player you can’t fit into the league squad, that means they get almost no football.
Posted from
United States

-



If they’re over 21 and not on the Champions League list for any reason other than being cup-tied, they’re going to get almost no football anyway.
Posted from
United States

-



Fair point. What about the non-Champions League clubs? You see it affecting them? Or do you see this not really impacting anyone in a big way?
Posted from
United States

-



Maybe Liverpool will save some money now…
Posted from
United States

-



The only real effect it will have is reducing the squad sizes, in its current format. If anything I would say this actively encourages teams to buy up foreign talent at a young age so they can be considered “home grown” in the future. Arsenal are sorted. If FIFA introduce some kind of rule restricting the trade of U-18s (which seems likely), this will then result in a mad scrap between Premier League teams as soon as every prospect turns 18 so that they can buy and train him for 3 years before he turns 21.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



I was just about to post something very similar to your last post Martin. 3 years – any nationality? No problem for the big teams.
Posted from
Australia

-



How can control Manchester City who spent 200 millions buying new players? The owner of the club is Arab and surely he can spend more then that without any debt. I read his response in reply to FA chief as they are bringing excitement to English Premier League
Posted from
Singapore

-



In searching for sites related to web hosting and specifically comparison hosting linux plan web, your site came up.
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.











