Game 39 is Back!

By: Daryl | August 4th, 2008

If you thought the Premier League’s Game 39 was going to just go away and die quietly, you were wrong. It’s back. It’s wearing a false moustache and glasses, but it’s back.

The latest plan to squeeze more money out of the Premier League is to take a “winter break” (air quotes because it means the exact opposite) from January 2011 onwards and play five mini-league-tournaments of four teams each in exotic foreign locations.

The Premier League have been careful to keep Richard Scudamore’s name off of this (he’s not quoted in any of the stories) but his money grabbing fingerprints are all over it.

In some ways it’s a smart compromise. The fundamental problem with Game 39 was that it damaged the 38 game integrity of the traditional league system. But for my money (or, more accurately, for some Japanese businessman’s money) this idea will suffer from the exact opposite problem.

It doesn’t matter how much prize money is on offer (rumour is that it’s £5millionplus for each club, with incentives to field first team players) these mini-leagues are just friendlies. They’re not the Premier League, and clubs will treat it accordingly.

If Steven Gerrard is exhausted in January and Liverpool are making a realistic push for the Premier League, do you really think Rafa Benitez is going to make him fly to Tokyo and play three extra games? Me neither.

More importantly, I assume the top fives teams will be distributed evenly around the globe to had up the five mini-leagues. Which means the good people of (inster host city) have more chance of seeing Blackburn vs Bolton than Man Utd vs Arsenal.

What the Premier League are proposing is basically playing a pre-season tournament in the middle of the season. Which begs the question: why not just do it in pre-season?

Soccer Forums

Team/International Results

Category: English Premier League

Tags: English Premier League, Game 39, Premier League, Richard Scudamore

« Zeljko Kalac’s Rough Day | Home | Malaysia to Kick Out All Foreign Footballers »

Subscribe   The Offside RSS Feeds

Print

Share

Comments   |  Add your comment

• Aravind |  August 4th, 2008 at 9:36 am

  
  
  

  Totally agree with you. Why don’t they play it in preseason, like the Railway Cup maybe. It would be far beneficial than playing Chengdu Blades, in my humble opinion.

  Posted from India

  

• BMatthews |  August 4th, 2008 at 9:40 am

  
  
  

  If Blackburn/Bolton happens in the Northeast US I’m there!

  Posted from United States

  

• Sam |  August 4th, 2008 at 10:33 am

  
  
  

  Yeah, at least the season will still have 38 matches, but I agree Daryl it’s just laughable still. That said if this were to happen there would probably be some loophole that made managers play their first-team players.

  Posted from United States

  

• AlexG |  August 4th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

  
  
  

  I don’t see why they don’t just play 37 games in England and the 38th abroad. A top 10 finish, then, could earn a team the right to not lose that extra home game.

  Posted from United States

  

• Kyle |  August 6th, 2008 at 8:25 am

  
  
  

  Now every soccer fan in the US gets to start the, “That’s horrible!…do you think they’ll come here?” riff.

  Posted from United States

  

• Nick |  October 22nd, 2008 at 8:03 am

  
  
  

  It seems as though the Premier League is destined to become the World League? Playing a game abroad would ruin the integrity of the league (i.e, Chelsea could play an away game in the US but would have far more fans than the supposed ‘home’ team). I think it looks like the Premier League ‘World Cup’ could become a reality. I did a post on my blog:

  http://footballssoul.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/global-domination-and-game-39/

  Posted from United Kingdom

  

Leave a Reply