Should MLS Purchase USL?

By: Daryl | August 18th, 2009
   

If that’s too many acronyms in one headline then allow me to elaborate. MLS is Major League Soccer, the top tier of football in the USA/Canada., as recognized by FIFA (and David Beckham). USL is United Soccer Leagues, consisting of USL 1 and USL 2, the de facto second and third tier of US/Canadian soccer.

I say de facto because there is basically no relationship between the two organizations. No promotion/relegation and apparently very little co-operation.

If anything, MLS delivers a major blow to USL every time it adds an expansion team. Especially in the Pacific Northwest. This year Seattle left USL 1 for MLS, in 2011 Portland and Vancouver will do the same. So MLS is basically eating USL alive and giving nothing in return.

Which might be why USL was put up for sale this summer.

But that’s not the big news. The big news is that – according to Canadian soccer blogger Ben Rycroft of Metro News Toronto – MLS is one of the parties interested in buying USL.

My head started to spin when I read that. First thought was the obvious one: Would this mean promotion/relegation between MLS and USL? Or even between the newly named MLS 1 and MLS 2?

The answer: Probably not. There’s still the old problem that MLS owners have paid the league a fat expansion fee, and won’t be interested in dropping down to play in a lower division after shelling out $30-$40m.

Unless.. maybe some sort of deal could be worked out where a promoted USL 1 team pays the expansion fee directly to the relegated MLS team. Essentially refunding the relegated owners investment.

But more importantly, why would MLS want to forego future expansion fees? No one’s going to pay millions of dollars to join a league they’re already part of. And if USL is in a financial shape worrying enough for the owners to sell, then it might be the sort of investment that sinks MLS rather than improving it.

So there’s a very good chance that this won’t happen. According to Rycroft’s post, a group of unnamed investors looks the more likely buyer than MLS:

“The USL owners have been in the loop the whole way since Nike put the league up for sale. There are a couple groups that are interested,” he said.

Two USL sources, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed MLS’s interest, but both said that it was looking less likely now, as MLS was not interested in the type of numbers Nike had asked for.

Their feeling was unless something dramatic happens, the third group, comprised of private investors, will be announced in the week ahead as the new owners of the USL.

Which is a shame. Not just because it means promotion/relegation not happening. But because it means the two professional soccer leagues in North America will continue to be independent of each other and engaged in a competition – for players, teams, fans, resources – that only one side is ever going to win.


Some Related Stories:


Category Category: MLS
Tags

   
Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

  • Gareth
    Promotion/relegation is the only way to maintain good football.

    Without it, the MLS will continue to be a below par league in comparison to the other professional leagues. The Mexican teams taking the MLS to school in each and every CONCACAF Champions League game played is a perfect example.

    Look on the difference in fan support when Chelsea, Inter/AC Milan, Barcelona and others came to play this summer and MLS games excluding Toronto and Seattle.

    The US has more than enough football fans but they are not going to throw their hard earned money away on artificial crap/nonsense/garbage that the MLS provides to them on a daily basis.
  • CSD
    Now a minor league type scenario would make more sense in the US.
  • Back to the topic at hand, though, I love USL. I really wish MLS would buy them and keep it going as a feeder league until promotion/relegation became feasible. (Maybe 20 years?)
  • If a team like the Galaxy dropped off to a lower league, attendance would just die.

    Not true. Seattle has topped 30,000 average attendance so far this year and has sellouts for every home game. Toronto has had sellouts for three years running. (Although for a smaller stadium.) Portland and Vancouver are expected to be equally big when they enter the league in 2011. They're proving that well-run teams CAN make money and be successful.

    The only real problems lie with the old-style thinkers who believe soccer can't be big in the US.
  • CSD
    Americans won't go for the promotion and relegation. We can't even get away from the playoff/draft/salary cap system. There's not enough passion for the sport here. If a team like the Galaxy dropped off to a lower league, attendance would just die.

    Anyway, the MLS doesn't have to buy the USL when they can put them out of business for free.
  • Brett
    I would LOVE to see this happen. Promotion/Relegation would be a big step towards making soccer bigger in America.
  • Ryan McManus
    Yes. Promotion and Relegation will make the American soccer more passionate.
  • David
    I think the MLS should buy the USL. Keep it the same as it is now, but build the USL2 league up with more teams (in order to be able to offer a second league for promotion/relegation). Then announce that in 2015 the MLS will become a relegation/promotion league with 24 teams, joining together the MLS and USL giving 6 years for current MLS teams to make up the 30-40 million they've put into it and ample time for the USL First Division teams to boost their squad, stadiums, marketing in preperation for the 2015 season. And as an added bonus... they will get rid of divisions and just stick to 1 table, everyone plays everyone, 1 game at home, 1 away. Thursday night games and saturday/sunday games.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           



World Cup 2010 News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives