Comments on: The 95 Yard Goal

By: matti

matti — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:03:05 +0000

I NO THIS PERSON!

By: dave martinez

dave martinez — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:56:46 +0000

3 feet. Boo metric system!

By: terry g

terry g — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:18:32 +0000

What’s a yard?

By: Tommy Wong

Tommy Wong — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:44:38 +0000

oh… with it… hah. I spoke on memory from last night.

By: Tommy Wong

Tommy Wong — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:44:05 +0000

Look @ the flag behind the goal, it is really blowing against the balls trajectory quite hard.

By: Johnny

Johnny — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:23:43 +0000

But doesn’t everything in Tulsa have a bit more elasticity?

By: jimmy

jimmy — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:45:42 +0000

also, looks like tho the shooter intended a try on goal he shot it short hence the bounce – his real intention was to lob the keeper w/o the bounce. If the bounce was intended then make sure the guy enrolls in a physics degree

By: Gordon

Gordon — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:55:07 +0000

I saw this on the yahoo front page. Interesting how it’s being described as such a good goal when the stupidity of the goalkeeper is the only reason it went in.

@ Tommy Wongs first post: Quality.

By: Tommy Wong

Tommy Wong — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:31:27 +0000

Awesome goal too. I’m suprised because I always found goal keeping to be one of our countries strong points, even right down to the college level.

Yikes.

By: Dave Martinez

Dave Martinez — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:11:58 +0000

Tommy, as always, when you are right, you are right . . .