

Berlusconi Says Those Naughty Words
By: chris | April 24th, 2008
Milan owner and soon-to-be reinstalled Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has done gone and made Michel Platini fume behind closed doors by airing out his thoughts on those potential/inevitable eleven dirty letters: “SuperLeague”. Silvio certainly isn’t the first and certainly won’t be the last, but every day someone brings it up is every day we get closer to what I can only see as the inevitable. And according to the PM himself, what else would it be about? Scrilla, baby. They spend too much to see their team play in front of empty seats.
“The great sides should make their own championship. When you invest a lot in a team it’s unthinkable to make them play against a team from the provinces whose stadium, usually with a capacity for 20,000 people, is inevitably half-empty.”
“When there are great teams playing the stadiums are always full and TV audiences are massive. Only with great teams can we become protagonists in Europe again.”
(Mmmmm….ratings. What does Berlusconi own again? Oh, right.)
Anytime someone knocks a team with a small stadium which would take half the town to fill itself, something which happens fairly often, the mind automatically goes to Empoli. Sad, sad Empoli. Here they are, in the top flight in calcio coming from a town of a whole 47,000 people and they get no love because they can’t adequately fill the seats well enough. Never loved, always insufficient. Where’s the romance, people? They went to the UEFA Cup for the love of Gesu.
Back to business. There’s going to be a lot more posturing and many more threats before they get down to brass tax (Arsene, and his doppelganger The Voyeur, have been spying on proceedings to decide what angle to use next), but one of these days it’s going to come fast and furious. Maybe not soon, but someday. There’s simply too much money waiting to be plucked from your pockets the trees.
Of course, one must also wonder whether or not Berlusconi would be promoting a new SuperDuperMoneyMaker if his club weren’t looking destined for the Plan B, the UEFA Cup. next year. Even with all of his big bucks, I’m sure Silvio enjoys getting that fat CL check every year; and as he plans for a year potentially devoid of said check, he’s dreaming of how nice it would be for that check to be an annual foregone conclusion.
Ah well. Another proponent, another day closer.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
|
Comments
-



This is especially bizarre because if you built a superleague based on this year’s form alone, it’s not at all clear that Milan would be in it. I mean, wouldn’t you want your superleague teams to be able to beat Parma at least once in a season?
And didn’t Empoli beat Milan at the San Siro this year? I guess big crowds must not count for everything…
Posted from
United States

-



It’s also pretty ironic that Berlusconi is talking about other teams with small crowds when the San Siro is MAYBE half full during the current Champions League group stages…
Posted from
United States

-



I can remember (I can’t find it, though) an interview by an ex-president of G14 back in 2001-03 (I think). And what he said was pretty logical and intelligent.
I’ll not talk about everything, but I’ll concentrate on what I remember of what was written about a potential “Super League”.
First off, he dismissed the idea of a Super League as “ridiculous”. Why? Because none of the clubs in the G-14 want to be last. Pretty much, the G-14 remain “big” clubs exactly because they are winning! If you create a “Super League” with, say, the EPL “big 4″, the Liga “big 2″, the Serie A “big 4″, and a couple other clubs (Lyon, Porto, Bayern, Olympiakos, Fenerbahce…) to get a grand total of 20… Who’ll accept being last? He believed that a Super League was out of question because all these “big clubs” want to say they’re the best in the world exactly because they win most of their games, and always finish at the top of the table.
Also, he mentioned that “too many big games kill big games”. Think about it. When you can tune in each week to watch Man U-Juventus or Bayern-Barcelona… it quickly loses appeal. The particular attractivity of such games is their rarity, so a Super League would shoot itself in the foot…
Lastly, who would you field in a Super League? Will clubs start having 30 “top players” in their squad? Won’t there be a risk of young players preferring to play “outside” the Super League in order to avoid the turnover and get more playing time? Also, what about players moving from one team to another? In an era when Man U refuse to sell to Liverpool because they’re league rivals, isn’t there a risk of stars being “bound” to one club, and when they leave they leave the whole Super League? (Ronaldinho can move from Barça to Milan AC because Milan aren’t exactly expecting to meet Barça soon, but would Barça be so confident if they were sure that Milan will play against them twice in the season?)
Also, wouldn’t the fact that other teams winning national trophies (there can only be one Super League winner) diminishes the prestige of the clubs in the Super League, and then what do you do? A Super League “B”? A “Second Division Super League”? What G14 club will accept the possibility of relegation in a Super League (and a season with loads of defeats) when you can cruise to another domestic title?
There were loads of other points, but one I’ll mention is : What about the level of play? Liverpool-Chelsea in a Champions League semi-final is very interesting, meaning that even if the game is historically bland, people will watch it, and TVs go wild to buy it. But if it’s just an “average” league game, with two sides that are, overall “average” (in the Super League)? Big teams often find it hard to break each other down, and would a season only of such closed games be attractive for the viewer (prestige captivates some, but would you want to watch Nottingham Forest vs. Ipswich? After all, they’ve both got European titles…)? Nothing is less sure.
To finish (and please, please bear with me), I’ll just state this person’s position by intellectual honesty. He believed that the Champions League should be a “Super League” with 5 clubs from the big 3, 4 from the following 4, and then gradually less, with two group stages, and only home-away from the quarterfinals onwards. He justifies this by saying that the best teams deserve to get through, so even if they’re only 5th in Italy, if they’re better than the Polish champions, then they deserve to go through, and that more games mean more income (stadia & TV), and therefore deeper squads (he states that when “better clubs” buy players, they “create player formation” in the club that gets the $$$, so deeper squads in bigger clubs means overall more high-quality players), with ultimately better games on hand.
There, that’s that.
Posted from
France

-



Right now, Berlusconi shouldn’t be talking about a SuperLeague, because if Milan were to be in it, they would be in last place, inevitably, because of their current form.
Before pulling crap like this, maybe he should work on making our team great again…Posted from
United States

-



i’ll do the super league b blog
Posted from
United States

-



Perhaps it’s because I’m a Milan fan and therefore doing everything I can to block out more stupid than I can handle in a season, but I can’t take what Berlu says seriously for a second. Not on anything. I have never heard the man say something smart when he can say something stupid instead, particularly with regards to football [although his support of Inter during the game against Liverpool I thought touching].
It is one of Serie A’s relative disadvantages in comparisons to the Premier League that some of its regular teams are based in small towns without much interest or agency among the population to actually attend games. It just isn’t part of the culture, and frankly, it doesn’t bother me in the slightest [except in the context of footie violence and what it does to keep “regular” folk, and especially women and kids, out of stadia]. For anyone to say what Berlu did would have been ill-advised, but it’s creepy when you realise that the Prime Minister of Italy can speak so lightly, and with no apparent thought of consequence for the long-term interest of calcio. But then you don’t have a real record for that, do you, old chap.
Posted from
United States

-



Oops. See what happens when you go straight to Italy. I didnt even see this and I brought it up over on the Italy page. Sorry, Chris, for thinking you were asleep.
So anyway, I agree. Berlusconi is a dick.
Posted from
United States

-



You did not need to keep apologizing, Shazback. Your points were very informative on an issue I’ve been pondering for a while. I see something like this coming, but have been vaguely uneasy about it for reasons I could not put into words. Your discussion hit most of them.
As for Berlusconi, he can occasionally have some ideas of interest, and I do like quirky characters. The key is not to take him too seriously. I’m sure many of you have seen this clip, but it illustrates the point. You just can’t take a guy like this too seriously.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=R9K6bs_fIWU
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed










