I was editing one sentence about an allowed goal in England that counted as a point in a game but was actually wide of the goal mouth. But I didn’t fix the rest of it before I hit submit.

The point was that it happens a lot, even when Inter aren’t involved and the referee’s themselves aren’t consistent.

That would be a company called Make Tailored Advertising. I hope someone has better luck finding a web site for that “multi-media sports advertising firm” than I did.

And they didn’t look at how Serie A would look without the refereeing errors.

They studied what the 3 daily sport newspapers in Italy reported as mistakes and how that affected the consumer, such as sports betting, to consumer watchdog groups.

The table readjustment was the newspapers and media outlets taking a flawed “study” (it’s really a crappy media survey) that was made of their own reporting and then refiguring the table and then passing it off as somehow objective.

By the way, the math on that refigured table is off. I mean it’s not like someone just made the whole thing up at all…

But obvious that you feel comfortable enough with it to use it as the jumping off point for this little post. I mean advertising companies never just make up stuff… right?

I await the next edition when you look at the Samp goal from last weekend or the Iaquinta header from a little while ago that had the exact same issues as Balotelli’s goal and were all granted.

Yeah right…