Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad

By: chris | July 31st, 2009

Well, it’s official: Adrian Mutu must pay Chelsea FC €17m, so says the Court for Arbitration of Sport.

The ruling was handed down awhile ago, sometime last year to be not quite precise, but Adrian went through the various appeals process with little success. In fact he probably wishes he’d kept his big bazzoo shut, as the penalty jumped up €5m+ during the process.

The legalities can be summed up as this: Adrian breached his contract by doing coke, and thus he must cover Chelsea’s investment – what with Chelsea being so poor and all.

How Adrian plans to pay this back remains to be seen. If he wants a giant, career-ending contract elsewhere, he’s going to have to submit a transfer request to Fiorentina – and even then, he’s now on the wrong side of 30 and it remains to be seen just how much he could command. He and his new bride had a fairly lucrative reality show back in Romania, which may still be going on, but that’s not going to cut it. Maybe he can panhandle on the streets of Firenze. Or perhaps a sex tape involving the couple, a circus mule and a pregnant Bobo Vieri will do the trick. Panhandling outside one of Roman Abramovich’s many houses and/or yachts would also help.

The guardian report even speculates Adrian could up and retire, appropriately thumbing his nose at Chelsea and walking off into the sunset. With the other footballing option being playing ’til he’s 57 in order to pay off his sins.

Whatever the case, Adrian might have become the poor man’s (sincerest apologies) Jean-Marc Bosman. The player whose name becomes synonymous with a court-ruling and, in this case much smaller, alteration of the sport’s landscape. Bosman’s ruling changed the financial landscape of the game, while Mutu’s could change the ramifications of off-field fun. After all, absolutely no one wants a Mutu.

So how many players will get an image of Mutu in a Chelsea kit the next time a mirror topped with white dust is shoved before their face? How many might think “hey, maybe ‘pulling a hammy’ and spending the next few weeks in rehab isn’t such a terrible idea“? I gather a fair few. Because while athletes love their fun, I can guarantee many, if not most, love their money more.

So while we can genuinely feel bad for Adrian after making what is a simple mistake – one many, many people make every day – this, dare I say, might actually be a good thing for football. How many athletes will take a bag of coke out of their pocket if it must be accompanied by a blank check?

The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games


Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad digg:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad reddit:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad fark:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad Y!:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad stumbleupon:Adrian Mutu Is Officially A Very Poor Anti-Drug Ad

Comments  

  • Paul (No1Fan) |  July 31st, 2009 at 9:45 am

    cornercorner

    Oh dear, turns out Mutu had a very expensive habit.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • adam |  July 31st, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    cornercorner

    as if hes going to ever pay anything close to that.

    theres alot to gain for financial advisers to help him hide his assets, watch them disappear and chelsea receive a fraction of this amount.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • alessio |  July 31st, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    cornercorner

    I hope that happens, adam. This is ridiculous, they didn’t have to sack him, they chose to.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Mike R |  July 31st, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    cornercorner

    So Maradona is shamed…kicked off his national team…and continues to wave around his drug problem like its nobodies business, and he’s regarded as the greatest footballer of all time.

    Mutu admits he has a problem, quits it immediately, gets help, complete revolutionizes his career, and everyone paints him as a villain.

    Hypocrisy much?

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Dumitru |  August 1st, 2009 at 4:30 am

    cornercorner

    That’s a very good point, alessio. if juve sold him for a discount price of 8 mill. euro to fiorentina, then chelsea could have recovered at least that, if they didn’t fire him.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Eugenius |  August 1st, 2009 at 8:57 am

    cornercorner

    If I remember correctly, he had a 5 year contract and played almost two years at Chelsea.

    So ~17mil out of ~22mil (his transfer fee) is for the remaining three years? NICE!

    Anyway, by firing him instead of selling him they forfeited his market value. I don’t know how you can argue against this, but I’m sure it’s possible, and was even done successfully. :)

    Now, can Mutu sue Juve for 8mil of those? Juve made 8mil profit by selling a player they got for free.

    Also keep in mind Juve sold him for such a low amount in the Calciopopli relegation fire-sale, when they sold players for ridiculous low prices.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Al |  August 1st, 2009 at 11:53 am

    cornercorner

    This is a horrid decision only showing that Chelsea can afford better legal counsel. I feel bad for Mutu. It does seem like bankruptcy might be the best option at this point. That’s about that… . Setting an example is punitive in a way which is inappropriate in court.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News
Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives