Barca 0 – Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 – Barca 0.

By: chris | April 28th, 2009

Barcelona 0 – Chelsea 0

Depending on how you look at matters – or what self-serving country you hail from -either Barcelona failed in their chances to take a result back to Stamford Bridge or Chelsea put in a hero’s defensive outfit at the home of the world’s best team.

And largely it’s a bit of both. Guus Hiddink back should be sore from the praise as he smartly decided against attacking Barcelona, the only option he really had to be fair, but rather to allow the Catalana attack into the final third where his Blues would limit space and pray the back held tight. It did to a degree, but Chelsea should feel very fortunate Barca weren’t as clinical as they’re known to be.

First thing’s first: many were worried about who would stop Lionel Messi. Forget Messi. The Unibrowed One, Bosingwa, who may have gotten away with one in the box late on, should be knighted for his efforts in clamping down on Dani Alves’ right foot. In the dying moments Barcelona had three clear chances – and one seemingly sure goal – and two of those came after whipping Dani Alves crosses. The man’s ability to curl into the box is unparalleled from the right back position and may be entering the pantheon of that pretty boy from Essex. Not enough can be said about their ability to eliminate that threat.

On the other side of the ball, the order of merit goes to a man who’s adorned many a blaugrana dartboard in the recent past. Victor Valdes, for the second time in a massive fixture this year, ducked into a phone booth and emerged a caped hero, stopping Didier Drogba’s breakaway late in the first half to preserve a barren scoreline. The first instance came in La Liga’s opening Clasico, stopping Royston Drenthe clear on goal to, again, keep the score level. Two moments which can’t be praised enough not only for the saves, but the added bonus of halting potential momentum. Flawed he is, but a saviour today.

And he may very well need to don a cape again next week, as Barcelona not only lost a potential result but also two centerbacks. Carles Puyol, who was surprisingly benched at the start, will be suspended for the return leg while Rafa Marquez suddenly crumbled on the pitch in a heap with nary a Blue in sight, typically a sign of a major injury, and can only be considered a major doubt for the return match. Thus it’s likely either Martin Caceras, who’s looked out of depth against mediocre Spanish competition, much less in London on the back end of a Champions League semi-final, or Eric Abidal, a leftback fresh off injury, partnering Gerard Pique. Hardly ideal.

In the end both teams were far from perfect and it wasn’t the barnstorming semi-final for which we’d all hoped. Something Chelsea will gladly tuck away in their luggage for the return leg, as we can say they certainly walk away more pleased with the result and the advantage going into the the game at Stamford Bridge.

But only until the opening whistle, at which point the arrows shifts back to Barcelona’s favor. Without the invaluable away goal, Chelsea will either have to chase a result or pray to keep the world’s most fluid attack at bay for another 120 minutes. Can Chelsea hold Barca scoreless for 210 minutes? Probably not – regardless of Guus’ brilliance. Which means Chelsea will have to push forward at time in the quest for at least one goal. Afford Barcelona space? You’d be smarter to play Russian roulette with a revolver and five bullets.



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games


Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0. digg:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0. reddit:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0. fark:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0. Y!:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0. stumbleupon:Barca 0 - Chelsea 0; Or, Guus 1 - Barca 0.

Comments  

  • Julian |  April 28th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    cornercorner

    I had no idea that Man U and Chelsea were going to catenaccio their way into the final. Would much rather see Arsenal win it if this is how Chelsea are going to win.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Gaston |  April 28th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    cornercorner

    i would say chelsea played their part as supposed to. now its barca turn to play chelsea’s way and see if they can prevail

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Wayne Farry |  April 28th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    cornercorner

    Julian, how can you say that about United?

    That’s ridiculous…

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • OhYes |  April 28th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    cornercorner

    Gaston: Barcelona would never play “Chelsea’s way.”

    We’ll see if Chelsea can contain Barcelona AND score at London.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Fcbnews |  April 28th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    cornercorner

    A report from the Barça outlook – http://www.oleole.com/blogs/fcbnews/posts/barca-0-chelsea-0

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Mike |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    cornercorner

    Julian, against Barca, what else are you going to do?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Ginge |  April 28th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    cornercorner

    I think catenaccio is a bit of an exaggeration, but regardless, when you’re playing a team who have scored four in both of their preceding two home games in the Champion’s league, against the double-winning champions of France and Germany as well, you would be foolish to afford them any kind of space.

    Abidal at centre back, to be honest, I’ve only seen him there once, during Euro 2008 (against Italy?), but he was catastrophic. Surely Caceras can’t be that bad

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • Kelsy |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    cornercorner

    Chelsea were a disgrace

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Jack |  April 28th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    cornercorner

    A disgrace, eh? You’re a disgrace for saying such nonsense.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • KG |  April 28th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    cornercorner

    Never knew that Guus would do a Fat Sam impression with his team … it was like watching Bolton/Blackburn/Sunderland vs Arsenal at the Emirates; Chelski’s bunch of overpaid c*nts PARKING THE BUS. The Chelsea owner would be so proud of this performance.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • fwembt |  April 28th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    cornercorner

    Chelsea were far from a disgrace today. They had a plan and they executed it perfectly without getting drawn out in some iditoic quest to play “beautiful” football. What Chelsea did today is as much football as what Barca did. Certainly Bayern and Lyon fans would have taken that. Results are what matter and 0-0 at the Nou Camp is gorgeous.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Ranjeet |  April 28th, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    cornercorner

    They can remove the 2 leg system to stop teams from shutting shop in one leg. Introduce a 1 leg system,where the winner on the night goes through. Match can be held at a neutral venue.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ginge |  April 29th, 2009 at 3:27 am

    cornercorner

    Yeah, they should definitely do that, hosting all CL games at neutral venues, because the away goals rule certainly doesn’t add anything to the excitement of the champions league, and the fact that both sets of fans will most often have to travel out of their country to watch every match, doesn’t really matter. I’m sure they all have plenty of money and time to go across Europe week in week out.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • martin |  April 29th, 2009 at 5:09 am

    cornercorner

    I agree, everyone knows that the second leg is inifinitely better than the first, almost every time.

    And I’m sorry but Chelsea were a discrace. The only way they came out of this game without conceding was by munching Barca players at every opportunity. You could see the frustration building, that’s what afforded Chelsea that chance at the end of the first half, which incidentally was their FIRST chance, in the 35th/40th minute. I get so sick of Chelsea’s brand of direct, muscle-based football. It will be a real shame if they go through to the final.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • alessio |  April 29th, 2009 at 5:48 am

    cornercorner

    Indeed, Martin.

    What Wayne, did you forget last year against Barca where Wayne Rooney and Park were playing left/right back?

    Posted from Spain Spain

    cornercorner
  • LorenzoRosanero |  April 29th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    cornercorner

    lol Alessio.

    Surely everyone knows it’s only ugly, defensive football when an Italian club plays it! Obviously, when a club like Chelsea puts in the same performance it’s lauded as the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Drew |  April 29th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    cornercorner

    I don’t see how a 0-0 draw away is a good thing. If nobody scores it will go to penalties, and Chelsea aren’t the best at PK’s. If Barca score Chelsea have to get 2 goals to win because of away goals. The only good result would be to outscore Barcelona. I wouldn’t be happy if a draw most likely meant losing against the best attacking football team in the world right now. And this is coming from a Madrid fan.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Michael |  April 29th, 2009 at 10:10 am

    cornercorner

    I believe if Chelsea would have pushed forward a little more they could have nicked the away goal. 0-0 isn’t a great score for Chelsea. The big blow for Barca is Puyol being suspended and Marquez possibly hurt. They should be right for the taking in the back. Is Chelsea going to sit back at the Bridge? Barca is still Barca even in London. Chelsea should have pushed more for an away goal. So if Barca sneak in a couple next week it puts even more pressure on Chelsea.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Mike |  April 29th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    cornercorner

    The bottom line is, Chelsea are the only team really to stop Barca from molesting them, thus, it was a good performance by Chelsea.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • john |  April 29th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    cornercorner

    Wasn’t the Champion’s League supposed to be about the best teams in Europe playing against each other? And by playing 10 men behind the goal, wasn’t Chelsea admitting they were not as good? Because if they were as good, they could defend and attack at the same measure of Barcelona. So how come no one is talking about teams like Chelsea ruining the competition?

    The likely argument will be that Chelsea used ‘tactics’ to win, and tactics are a legitimate qualifier for the title of ‘best team.’ I say: bull. Can you imagine someone’s reaction if a team like Shakhtar Donetsk was winning their way to the finals by route of bus-parking, scoreless shootouts? I mean, if tactically they could pull it off, why not? If results are the only thing that matters, anyway.

    Frankly, if that’s the kind of football on display in the CL, I’d rather not watch. In fact, I’d rather watch badminton. And people criticize Americans for being entertained by the NFL…

    The last thing I’d like to point out: how will performances like Chelsea’s effect the popularity of the Champion’s league with the casual viewer? Or the neutral observer? I can’t imagine that kind of ‘tactical’ play being very interesting to watch if you have nothing at stake.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News
Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives