Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B

By: chris | July 10th, 2008

While most people will gawk at Sepp Blatter putting his foot in his mouth yet again, the head cheese at FIFA actually said something yesterday which was interesting but didn’t offend entire demographics. Massive shocker any way you look at it. Of course, his stupidity will force this under the radar, so keep the credit at a minimum.

What doesn’t come as a surprise, however, is that Sepp has been thinking about a Plan B in the event that South Africa proves itself unqualified to host the World Cup in less than two years time. Not just thinking, actually, but he’s been in contact with three different federations to formulate a strong backup plan, which every day looks more and more like Plan 1B, not Plan B.

“I have spoken to three possible, not only possible, but three associations and countries that would be able to stage the World Cup in one year’s time,” Blatter said in an interview broadcast on Thursday by Sky News. “They need one year (to prepare).”

This has been possible, if not likely, all along, and finally Sepp lining his pockets with the highest bidder’s offering has come back to bite him in the arse. South Africa, as noble an attempt as this may be to get the tournament on the continent, was simply a poor choice as host at this point in time. Their infrastructure is far from ready and they’re going to bring the professional sport’s largest revolving tourist attraction to a country with an astounding rate of violent crime. So these three destinations, whatever they are, can hardly be any worse. (Unless, of course, Sepp has been buddying up with Robert Mugabe, which is sadly not an impossibility.)

The key is that each of these countries will only need one year to get ready, which says a lot about where there current infrastructure stands. The 2009 Confederations Cup will be held in South Africa as a test run for WC2010, and if that doesn’t go well, these three federations will be asked for the highest bid given a hasty phone call to start putting things in motion. That is, if it gets that far.

But that’s where the information stops. Sepp won’t tell the three countries or associations up for consideration, which leaves us with questions. Obviously they would need to have a World Cup ready stadium structure already in place, which means you can start looking at Europe or North America - South America unlikely because Brazil is already hosting World Cup 2014.

The first inkling is England, simply because they’re World Cup ready right now and haven’t hosted the tournament since 1966, while Germany, Italy, France and the US have all hosted since 1990. Also Spain, which would be a nice reward for this past Euros win, who last hosted in 1982. Or perhaps even an Iberian peninsula tournament in Spain & Portugal. But then again, Sepp wants to rotate continents and keep the tournament from becoming Eurocentric.

The US is a possibility, but they held it just four tournaments ago. Not long at all. One also has to wonder if Australia has put in a call as well. Not that I know a single thing about their stadiums and infrastructure over there, but the A-League is rising and doing well, much like the general state of soccer, and now wouldn’t be a terrible time to throw them into a full on fury.

Many potential options. The wild guess? England, Spain & United States. Dark horse as Australia.

Or are there other more likely options?



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games

Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B digg:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B reddit:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B fark:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B Y!:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B stumbleupon:Blatter Putting Calls In For Plan B

Comments  

  • Naeem |  July 10th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    cornercorner

    Here’s an interesting question.

    Does South Africa still get a berth at the WC2010 should it be revoked from the country, seeing as we aren’t part of qualifying (actually we are cos AFCON and WC qualifiers are the same for Africa).

    But interesting nevertheless.

    Anyway.

    I have my doubts about our readiness.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Lucas |  July 10th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    cornercorner

    Brazil?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Lucas |  July 10th, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    cornercorner

    Oops, never mind.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • derek |  July 10th, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    cornercorner

    Australia definitely has the facilities to host the WC, having comfortably hosted the Olympics in 2000 and youth World Cups previously. The question is how the ongoing leagues of other football codes would be affected. Many of the stadiums that would be needed are also homes to rugby league, rugby union or Australia Rules teams who might not take kindly to an interrupted season (since it would be held in our winter).

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Andrew |  July 10th, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    cornercorner

    It would be so incredibly awesome if it was held in the US, cause I was like, three the last time it was here.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • bluemeanies |  July 10th, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    cornercorner

    The US is definately on the on call list and will always be on call list after they did an admirable short notice job on the 2003 Womens World Cup relocation from China due to SARS. IIRC that wasn’t even a year.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Shane |  July 10th, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    cornercorner

    I wouldn’t think they would pick a back up site until they know who all the qualified teams are. Would you want Australia hosting as a back up if they fail to qualify? Same goes for the US or any European nation.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • mele419 |  July 10th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    cornercorner

    While I’d like for it to be in the U.S. I’d rather it be in a country i want to travel to. I think that just adds to the experience. Instead of taking the train into Boston for a game (which i do constantly) I’d have to go and fly to a new country and have a totally new experience, which would be awesome.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Kristian |  July 10th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    cornercorner

    As a Brit living in the States it would be nice to have it here, but logically it should go to England. The country has the best infrastructure and stadia ready to hold the biggest sporting event in the World. The strength of the Premier League and the fact that the home of football hasn’t held the event for over 40 years is also a major factor. But FIFA’s uneasy relationship with the English could sway it away from the country. It basically will end up with who can sweet talk the corrupt Sepp Blatter the best.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • $killZ |  July 10th, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    cornercorner

    blah blah blah. the tournament will go ahead in south africa, its all bullshit like what their saying about poland ukraine. I promise all of you it wont be moved. and i cant think of a more boring undesrving place than australia to hold the tournament and the next time its held in US it has to be co hosted by canada cause football is very very popular in canada and we also have good stadiums especially the new one in toronto.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ahmad |  July 10th, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    cornercorner

    Canada will be the best alternative Host for WC2010. We have hosted the World Cup Tournament for under 16 last year and it was a huge success.

    Posted from Canada Canada

    cornercorner
  • Arminius |  July 10th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    cornercorner

    If South Africa fails, I hope the substitute is not the USA. No soccer territory, no democracy any more.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Arminius |  July 10th, 2008 at 4:49 pm

    cornercorner

    Yet another time: in my case “Posted from the USA” is wromg. I am in Germany.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Arminius |  July 10th, 2008 at 4:49 pm

    cornercorner

    Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr… ;-)

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Sam |  July 10th, 2008 at 5:38 pm

    cornercorner

    Ahmad: We hosted the u-20 world cup. and FYI, no, Canada won’t get it. I hear FIFA wants stadiums to seat more than 10,000.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • $killZ |  July 10th, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    cornercorner

    ever heard of the Sky-Dome mother fucker?! 50 000 capacity. (Canada)

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ryan |  July 10th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    cornercorner

    A plastic pitch? Fifa will stay far far away? Also you need more than one stadium with more than 30,000.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Corey |  July 11th, 2008 at 7:56 am

    cornercorner

    I find it funny how people think the US is not a good venue because of the disinterest of the American public, but the Rose Bowl was filled for the final in 94, setting attendance records at 94,000 people. That is an impressive feat everywhere, not many stadiums in the world hold more people.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Grant |  July 11th, 2008 at 8:08 am

    cornercorner

    There is no way FIFA are going to let people get kidnapped or murdered at the World Cup. Not a chance.

    England probably has a better sized country and public transport for hosting a tournament, but with how weak the dollar is, I wouldn’t be suprised if Europeans wouldn’t rather come here for a month.

    Who needs a year? We could host the World Cup on Saturday

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Grant |  July 11th, 2008 at 8:11 am

    cornercorner

    Oh, and btw, there is precident for a nation getting the tournament just 16 years after they hosted it, especially if there is an emergency. Anybody remember that after hosting a good WC in ‘70, Mexico was called on when Columbia pulled out of the ‘86 WC and FIFA gave it back to Mexico. That was a good tournament (Hand of God goal, Maradonna generally being unstoppable, and even the Mexican Wave was created there. Having another WC in this country in 2010 would finish the job that 1994 started, i.e. making soccer a major sport in this country.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Sam |  July 11th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    cornercorner

    $killz or whatever: There ain’t twelve skydomes in our country, dude. Besides, the skydome isn’t the biggest in the country, so keep your mouth shut.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners







Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives