<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Club World Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html</link>
	<description>League Football, Soccer News and Views from Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-123082</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html#comment-123082</guid>
		<description>ARSENAL SHOULD BE FIRST THEY RULE. MANCHESTER UTD SUCKS. OLE OLE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARSENAL SHOULD BE FIRST THEY RULE. MANCHESTER UTD SUCKS. OLE OLE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html#comment-900</guid>
		<description>it is rediculous that middlesborough is ranked higher than manchester united....even more rediculous is the fact that ManU is ranked 41st WHEN IT LEADS THE ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE. These rankings are terrible. absolute crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is rediculous that middlesborough is ranked higher than manchester united&#8230;.even more rediculous is the fact that ManU is ranked 41st WHEN IT LEADS THE ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE. These rankings are terrible. absolute crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaiah</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html#comment-888</guid>
		<description>After reading the IFFHS ranking system, it seems fatally flawed. In ranking teams they forget that not all &quot;continental cups&quot; are of equal value. The UEFA Cup is worth the same number of points as the Champions League and since there are far more games in the UEFA Cup than the CL, Sevilla had the ability to dominate that continental cup and thus earn themselves more points because the competition, albeit weaker than La Liga and the CL, has more games that are worth more. (14 points for a win in the Cup or the CL, while only 4 in La Liga; a draw in Cup is worth to the IFFHS than a win in La Liga -- 7pts to 4pts)

That is why the rankings are so off.

(Note that Palermo is in 17th, while Real Madrid is in 24th...makes sense...)

(Also note that #287 is the first American team, the LA Galaxy, down 3 spots from the previous rankings.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the IFFHS ranking system, it seems fatally flawed. In ranking teams they forget that not all &#8220;continental cups&#8221; are of equal value. The UEFA Cup is worth the same number of points as the Champions League and since there are far more games in the UEFA Cup than the CL, Sevilla had the ability to dominate that continental cup and thus earn themselves more points because the competition, albeit weaker than La Liga and the CL, has more games that are worth more. (14 points for a win in the Cup or the CL, while only 4 in La Liga; a draw in Cup is worth to the IFFHS than a win in La Liga &#8212; 7pts to 4pts)</p>
<p>That is why the rankings are so off.</p>
<p>(Note that Palermo is in 17th, while Real Madrid is in 24th&#8230;makes sense&#8230;)</p>
<p>(Also note that #287 is the first American team, the LA Galaxy, down 3 spots from the previous rankings.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insearchoffootball</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>insearchoffootball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html#comment-887</guid>
		<description>how can liverpool be 4th ... this is a joke, just like all the rankings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can liverpool be 4th &#8230; this is a joke, just like all the rankings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/club-world-rankings.html#comment-883</guid>
		<description>It would be hard to argue that Sevilla is better than Barcelona considering the outcome in Spain last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be hard to argue that Sevilla is better than Barcelona considering the outcome in Spain last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

