

CONCACAF Champions League, Coming to a Club Near You. (Unless your team sucks)
By: Laurie | January 29th, 2008
Europe’s Champions League, the tournament where the best European clubs fight it out for the European club championship, is my favorite competition short of World Cup. It’s even better in some ways because it happens every year.
I love seeing the clashing styles of clubs from various countries. I love the best of the best of the best aspect. I love the fact that there is always a minnow or two from a smaller country who makes it past the group stage ahead of some bigger-money teams — and gets a fair bit of money in the process.
Of course there are some downsides. The revenue generated by the CL is one of the main reasons that the rich European teams tend to get richer. And it can detract from and overshadow league play. And the best team doesn’t always win.
But those are minor details. I still love it.
Well guess what, CONCACAF fans? Starting this year, we’re getting our very own Champions League.
The United States and Mexico will have four teams each in the tournament, and the Caribbean region three, along with two each from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Panama. One team each will come from Belize, Canada, Belize and Nicaragua.
Eight teams will be seeded directly to the first round: two each from the United States and Mexico, and one apiece from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. The other 16 will play home-and-home series in a preliminary round in late August and early September.
Four groups of four teams will contest the first round in September and October, with the top two in each group advancing to the quarter-finals in February 2009. The semifinals will start the following month, and the final will be played in April. The winner earns a berth in the FIFA Club World Cup.
Of course, not everyone is thrilled by this turn of events. Nick Green of The Daily Breeze says:
Out goes a manageable eight-team tournament with a two-game, aggregate score series determining the winners of each round. In comes an unwieldy 24-team tournament that includes a stamina-sucking six group games (three home and three away) in a little more than six weeks. …
The idea is laudable, the execution is not.
The man does have a point. CONCACAF is not Europe, and the MLS schedule, for one, is already so packed with extra tournaments that scheduling is nearly impossible. And most teams just don’t have the roster depth to cover players who fall apart due to overscheduling. This could end up hurting league play at a time when MLS is desperately trying to capitalize on the Beckham effect to build it up.
But I suppose we’ll cross those bridges when we come to them. For now, we have our own Champions League.
(And believe it or not, as far as I can tell, MLS has not figured out a way to get Beckham and the Galaxy into this year’s competition. But stay tuned. I’m sure it’s only a matter of time.)
Official MLSnet announcement is here. I couldn’t get it to load this morning, but maybe you’ll have better luck.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



I’m assuming that Toronto FC counts here as a US side, because they are in the US league. Is that correct, or will they always be the team from Canada?
Posted from
United States

-



That’s the debate traveling around the blogosphere today. The other options are the Vancouver Whitecaps or the Montreal Impact. Jeff Bull over at Center Holds It has a funny post on just this subject.
http://centerholdsit.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/concacaf-cl-ah-canada/
Posted from
United States

-



Love it! It’d especially be great if a US team that’s not LA won! The US winning the first one could give some much needed legitimacy to the MLS.
Posted from
United States

-



Too many damn teams in this tournament! Why cant we just make the Super Liga the Champions League. Last years Super Liga was very very promising and the final was incredible.
Posted from
United States

-



Can’t make Superliga a Champions league until we in include Costa Rica, Hondurus, Guatamala, Panama, El Salvador, the Carribean ect ect. Otherwise it would be like a European Champs league with only the Italian and English league. And the new Superliga would look pretty much like this. Good thing that they are trying, nows the time to axe Superliga and truthfully- only two spots for Costa Rica? That is depending on who you talk to the second (yes, above MLS) or third best league (for those who tell the truth) in the region and definately the best league in Central America, putting it on an equal footing with those others is a mistake. Take away El Salvador or Panama’s second and give it to them.
Toronto can’t compete in the previous incarnation because the spots are given to the national confederation to distribute as they please and while Canadian teams participate in US leagues the USSF is not about to give such a gift to the Canadian FA. The Canada spot will be determined however Canada sees fit and wil give a shot to Montreal & Vancouver probably. Heck, Puerto Rico can qualify through the Carribean.
Posted from
United States

-



but wait what are these extra tournaments? superliga? us open cup? doesn’t EPL have the FA cup and Carling Cup plus Champions League for the big four? i mean how are teams even selected to superliga anyway?
maybe they could have a mini preseason tournament like mexico’s interliga for the 4 places.Posted from
United States

-



i don’t understand why just 1 team from canada..and 2 from panama,honduras or el salvador.are there teams that are better than whitecaps or montreal?
Posted from
Romania

Comments are closed










