Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose?

By: Bob | July 17th, 2007

clash2.gifIf you ever want to maintain a soccer blog that does not lack for content you should consider firing one up about MLS expansion. The talk of which cities the league will expand to occupies some fans’ minds more than the play in the league itself. The MLS brass enjoys playing this up by seemingly announcing a new list of possible expansion candidates every three months or so. The names on the lists change, but the expectations and debates do not.

Those who follow the MLS expansion chatter closely always have the day before the league’s all-star game circled on their calendars. That is the day when league commissioner Don Garber steps to the podium and gives his state of the league message, a message that often includes big announcements and that adds fuel to the expansion fire.

Garber’s speech on Wednesday will once again be followed closely by those who read the MLS expansion tea leaves. He is on record as saying that he wants to add three more teams to the 13-team league. He listed the following cities as possibilities in an Internet chat on the MLS website Tuesday.

There’s more interest in MLS expansion than at any other time in the history of the sport in the country. Without prioritizing any one market, here is a rundown of the cities: Vancouver, Portland, Seattle, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Antonio, St. Louis, Cleveland, Milwaukee, Rochester, New York City, Atlanta, Miami and Las Vegas.

Which of those cities will end up with one of the three expansion teams? There has also been increasing speculation the past few weeks that one of those three teams will be in San Jose, a city that lost its team two years ago and whose potential owner is quoted as saying, “We’re not 1,000 percent there and we don’t want to pre-empt any announcement from Major League Soccer.” Sounds a bit like someone pre-empting an announcement, doesn’t it?

A few questions for those of you who follow this more closely than I. Does San Jose deserve another shot at MLS? Should it be a priority market in the expansion game or should the league focus on new teams in new cities? If you have to guess, and indeed you have to, what are the next three cities to experience MLS fun?

UPDATE: SI is reporting the Quakes are back



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games


Category Category: MLS, World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose? digg:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose? reddit:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose? fark:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose? Y!:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose? stumbleupon:Does MLS Know the way back to San Jose?

Comments  

  • Eddie |  July 17th, 2007 at 12:57 pm

    cornercorner

    As long as a stadium deal can be sorted out San Jose should have a team. They’ll do well in a new stadium with a new owner.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • combat chuck |  July 17th, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    cornercorner

    Six cities on the left coast? MLS fans in the southeast aren’t feeling the love.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • AJ |  July 17th, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    cornercorner

    MLS needs to look for a fresher market. It is as simple as that, forget San Jose.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Dave's Football Blog |  July 17th, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    cornercorner

    I didn’t see Philadelphia on that list. The Sons of Ben will be very, very disappointed.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • bluemeanies |  July 17th, 2007 at 1:48 pm

    cornercorner

    Six cities who have some semblance of an interested investor and some degree of planning occuring regarding a team on the west coast and only two in the southeast (atlanta & miami). Yes, the southeast should feel hard done- that their local business men don’t seem to want to invest.

    As far as San Jose if the stadium gets built the history isn’t as bad as some of the naysayers would have it. According to the leaked memo that the San Diego reporter got San Jose was solidly in the middle of paid attendance (not to be confused with attendance which was padded in a lot of other places). The stadium is the key and the airport site is looking good.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Bob |  July 17th, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    cornercorner

    Garber had this to say about Philly:

    No news yet but continuing to make progress but I’m hopeful, and even a bit bullish, about MLS’s opportunities in Philly. We’ve been lobbying in the State House for public support of a facility and believe we have secured real interest from what we believe will be a terrific ownership group.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Brian |  July 17th, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    cornercorner

    I know it’ll never happen, but relegation/promotion would do wonders for the MLS.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Harold |  July 17th, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    cornercorner

    Philly should be a no brainer. The MLS needs atmosphere and if there is one thing that Philly fans can provide is atmosphere. Are they serious about Vegas? I’m assuming the games would be played indoors.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Todd Pounds |  July 17th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    cornercorner

    I heard Vegas has offerred to build a stadium with a roof in the 100’s of millions!

    Philly is a no brainer! Especially with a rich soccer history including clubs like FC Delco and the size of the market. Just don’t do southern jersey!!! Put a stadium out on the main line or just west of Philly!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Todd Pounds |  July 17th, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    cornercorner

    I also think that with the performance of the TFC fans that canada deserves another team! Vancouver!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Dan |  July 17th, 2007 at 8:47 pm

    cornercorner

    Is the league healthy enough to even support more expansion?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Abby |  July 18th, 2007 at 3:19 am

    cornercorner

    Pacific Northwest! I prefer Seattle since I live there, but I’ll grudgingly allow Portland or Vancouver instead. I’m nice like that.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Todd Pounds |  July 18th, 2007 at 7:55 am

    cornercorner

    I think dilution of the talent pool could be a major issue as well. I know the NHL has experienced this. With dilution of talent the quality of the games/matches decreases. Once upon a time there were many “stars” per team in the NHL, now the NHL only has a few “stars” per team (I know this is in part due to poor player marketing as well).

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News
Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives