FIFA Done With Chelsea, Manchester United Next.

By: chris | September 4th, 2009
   

Everybody is well versed on yesterday’s big news of Chelsea’s transfer ban until 2011, a protracted legal battle which has surely only just begun. When it became clear that Gael Kakuta breached a youth contract with a pre-arrangement to a professional contract once he turned 17, all sorts of warning signs began going off. A senior player would have been different, as that’s a no-no, which everybody, or most, know. But a youth contract makes this a much larger deal, setting an incredible precedent and puts not just Chelsea into the spotlight.

And while Chelsea is off pleading their case to CAS, FIFA will soon get some more paperwork on their desk. Next up: Manchester United.

Sir Alex & Co. went into France this summer and poached highly rated defensive midfield phenom Paul Pogba formerly of Ligue 2 side Le Havre. The Frenchmen were, understandably, livid.

“We are still pursuing our case,” Belsoeur said yesterday. “It is a very serious case. We are confident that we’ll win because it is in the best interests not just of our club but of sport. We spend €5m [£4.3m] on our academy every year out of a turnover of €12m. It is a huge investment.

“We do that to give a chance to our players to develop for our first team, not to be an academy for others. What is the point of investing in an academy if the players leave at 16? This is clearly a message from Fifa to protect the education system.”

FIFA has denied receiving any official paperwork as of yet, but it’s well on the way. And Pogba may not be the only one, as last year one particular coup infuriated his former club, Lazio, in the form of Federico Macheda – mostly due to the form of Federico Macheda.

And ManU are adamant they’ve done nothing outside the rules, but then so weren’t Chelsea at the time of Gael’s capture, with FIFA clearly feeling differently.

It’s also important to remember that this is not FIFA, nor is it UEFA, initiating some witch hunt. Lens brought their grievance before FIFA and the world’s governing body determined their punishment from there. Likewise, Le Havre will be the one seeking consequences from the Paul Pogba transfer rather than FIFA turning over English clubs left and right.

The usual suspects can expect overseas clubs too be looking into legal avenues – Arsenal and Real Madrid’s lawyers must be working particularly hard these days – and there could be a domino effect. Or there could be an absurd backlog, as one would imagine plenty of smaller clubs will be looking for their fair share in return. And this means there will be plenty of legal work to be done.

So if you’re an out of work lawyer, FIFA may not be a bad place to look these days.


Some Related Stories:


Category Category: World Football
Tags

   
Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

  • martin
    The Binocular - Berbatov has absolutely nothing to do with this.
  • As far as I know United never persuaded/got a player to break a contract. What United did is technically within UEFA guidelines. Not saying that poaching youngsters is okay…it’s just different.
  • Also, apparently Marseille are going to be filing charges against Chelsea for a different player. What if they get found guilty twice?
  • I completely support Le Havre here. Well done on their part.
  • ish
    lol have u seen the news manU are under the spotlight for the exact same thing, a player breached his supposed no solicitation contract to sign with manU. Absolutely no difference to the chelsea case.
  • To Elle,

    ManU have down nothing wrong? What about the whole Berbatov deal? I believe an inflated transfer fee may have silenced people at Spurs.

    Football clubs do these things because the rules are not well defined.

    Maybe Chelsea will win their appeal but because FIFA are trying to take action, other clubs will behave more conservatively.


    What do you think of the Europa League?
  • elle
    There's a difference between what United did and what Chelsea did. As far as I know United never presuaded/got a player to break a contract. What United did is technically within UEFA guidelines. Not saying that poaching youngsters is okay...it's just different. The real problem with poaching youngsters needs to be solved by UEFA, either they need to make it so English clubs can't sign under-18s from other countries, or the other countries need to make it so they can sign under-17s on professional contracts.
  • But, it doesn't have to be done this way.

    My team, Barnsley, currenly own the youngest player to have played professionly in England, Reuben Noble-Lazarus.

    He is a product of our excellent academy. We have ALLOWED him to trial with United, and we have also signed an agreement that once he is a full-profession, they can sign him at anytime they want, and no other club can until they have made the decision.

    So, Barnsley get to keep him, United get first option, and he gets 1st team football.
  • Johnny
    @ Graeme "Good news for the lawyers"

    ' made me laugh out loud. Thanks :D
  • What's FIFA's Human Resources address?
  • asr
    ha ha,its time to pay for petrucci,macheda and the others!!hahahahahhahahahaha
  • James
    I am a Man U supporter, but I say Get 'em all! It's completely unfair how big clubs poach kids.
  • Graeme
    Good news for the lawyers
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           



World Cup 2010 News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives