How Much Attention should Countries pay to Clubs needs?

By: Rob | September 12th, 2009
   

What\'s the problem?So the old Club vs Country debate is back in the news again, as Arsene Wenger was in an irritable mood regarding Andrei Arshavin’s appearance for Russia against Wales on Wednesday. The Arsenal midfielder has a groin problem, which he picked up when his club took on Man United a couple of weeks ago and missed his countries game against Liechtenstein last saturday. But he played against Wales on Wednesday, and Wenger was incensed.

But Arshavin, rarely shy of speaking his mind, has spoken out and said that he’s glad he played against Wales.
“There was no recurrence of a groin injury, as has been reported in many publications. Moreover, I’m more concerned today with my knee than the groin. Nothing appears to have worsened, scans on Friday are only showing issues in the knee”

Oh only the knee Andrei. That’ll set Arsene’s mind at rest.

The big question though, is who should have the final say when it comes to players risking injuries to play for their countries?

Should it be the club paying the wages? Or the player himself? Or the country, who presumably wouldn’t want to seriously injure a star player anyway?

I’m not sure about anywhere else, but in the UK this gets alot of press coverage. Rafa Benitez is usually first in the queue to complain about the treatment of his players at international level (ie for Spain) and he does seem to usually come back with Fernando Torres unavailable.

I have to say, that in a sense, I respect that Arshavin has put his country first. I don’t entirely understand his logic (in that article above, he both claims that he hasn’t exaggerated his injury, he’s worried about his knee, and that he couldn’t play this weekend regardless of whether he played against Wales) but I kind of think its admirable that he’d be willing to play for his country through an injury.

Maybe that’s just because I’m used to it being the other way around for England. Sol Campbell could have got about 50 more caps for us had he not been “injured” every time England had a friendly, and Steven Gerrard also always seems to have picked up a knock (which he’s shaken off by the next Liverpool league game) when friendly matches come around.

I think that really, players should want to play for their countries, it is, surely the highest honour one can attain. I can understand the clubs frustrations as they pay the wages of the players, and I think countries should be fair on clubs by not picking sticking a painkiller in someone and asking them to prolong their period on the sidelines.


Some Related Stories:


Tags

   
Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

  • mohamed abdelrahman
    hi all iam egyptian i want to play football in any club my skills very good my position wing right or back right my age 18years old to contact me madoumadou68@yahoo.com or my fone 0189727388
  • thierry
    Arshavin was signed because of what he did with the national teams just like most teams fall in love with players during tournaments lik Euro or WC.

    Lets' face it, most people didnt know who he was until that brilliant game against Holland.

    National team duty might injure some players but so can practices and friendlies played in america on turf field against 4th division hackers (replace america with any asian money tour destination and fake grass for cow pastures.)
    I dont see the big teams giving those big cash grab tours up any time soon.
  • Ian
    I'm with Alex - country first. But realistically, the money is going to win most times. As a huge national team fan, I hate to say it, but we would have lost this battle a long time ago if the World Cup (and to a lesser extent other tournaments like the Euros) weren't themselves such huge festivals of money. They are such massive sporting events that international football still gets something of a place at the table, but on a day to day basis, the clubs are definitely king in that department.

    Letting the players decide would be great, but they will certainly be "encouraged" to decide a certain way by the folks that pay their checks.
  • Alex
    The players should decide. The clubs should have no business in international football. Players are injured all the time at club level meaning they can't play for their country, I hear very few international managers complaining. For me it's country before club. I'd hope that's the same with most players.

    After all, what's the point in internationals when all the best players have been bubble-wrapped for their clubs?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           



World Cup 2010 News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives