Man City: The New Evil Empire

By: chris | September 2nd, 2008
   

topic du jour

It appears stealing the closing act was not enough, as Manchester City’s new owners would like to steal tomorrow’s matinee, the following evening performance, and the rest of the shows from here on out. Their point was made by the frankly shocking snatch of Robinho and equally as surprising bids for David Villa, Mario Gomez and Dimitar Berbatov, who went across town anyway. But what’s more is the sheer insanity of their plans to nab a certain star from across town, and the revelation that Robinho is now the highest paid footballer in the world.

To get particulars out of the way, Robinho now makes £160,000 per week. So clearly it was all about the football. But if Dr. Sulaiman Al-Fahim and the rest of his cohorts have their way, he won’t even be the most highly paid player in the Citeh starting XI come January:

“Ronaldo has said he wants to play for the biggest club in the world, so we will see in January if he is serious…Real Madrid were estimating his value at $160m (£90m) but for a player like that, to actually get him, will cost a lot more; I would think $240m (£135m). But why not? We are going to be the biggest club in the world, bigger than both Real Madrid and Manchester United…Al-Fahim also confirmed that Torres and Fábregas were among his targets as City look to bring in a “minimum 18″ players.”

The absolute arrogance of that claim is astounding. Being the biggest club in the world is about much more than financial clout and gilded signings. It’s about titles, prestige, longevity and then a couple more titles. At this point, to match Real Madrid’s accomplishments, City would have to win the next 29 Prem titles and 9 Champions League trophies in the near future. The prestige of wearing the historic blanco? Talk to me in 50 years.

But within England, the new owners at Manchester City have inexplicably managed to make Chelsea and Manchester United the lesser of two evils, not heightened objects of derision, absurd as it may be. At these rates Andriy Shevchenko and Dimitar Berbatov look like frugal purchases born out of financial prudence. Hell, Michael Essien looks like the bargain of the new millennium. It’s been obvious for quite sometime transfers between Prem clubs are a bit expensive, but where will they go with Man City’s now limitless checkbooks?

They’ve gone from human rights violators and fugitives to a vast chest of money which has swung the balance of economics in the world of football at the snap of a finger. If Robinho is worth £160k a week, how much is Kaka worth? Or Cristiano Ronaldo? Or, oh I don’t know, the thirty or so players in the world who are much better than he? How many agents do you think read the news and put in a call to their client’s employers this very morning? When that giant bid does come from the blue side of Manchester, how much further beyond their threshold will a club have to go to keep a player like Cesc or Fernando Torres? Yes, many athletes are reasonable and will weigh the pros and cons thoughtfully, but tell a guy he can double his weekly paycheck and he’ll push his grandmother out of the way to sign the contract.

Roman Abramovic has taken a sound lashing for opening the floodgates in London, but it was inevitable, and unfortunately so is this. A bigger, badder checkbook is on the way, ready to bigfoot the competition and remind us how good it used to be.


Some Related Stories:


Tags

   
Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

  • demola
    as they say, all is fair love & war. But in this case i think that needs to be re-phrased as "all is fair with footie & billionaires". The January transfer window might actually be more interesting than we think. can't wait to see what they offer for C.Ronaldo. But as a Chelsea fan, do i really care? Let the fattest check books win.
  • All is fair in the present day world...amen !
  • Italianfan
    Eventually every top European league will have the value of 4 Billionair clubs in their leagues. What does that mean? It means its just inflation and everyone will be in the same league again. Don't expect Arab women at the grounds at Man city for support. I wonder if they will ban women and start controlling our morals to Shria laws?
    Or it could go the otherway where acceptence of Westen values may change their own culture to more freedoms. That would be the day.

    It's a shame really its not illegal to have foreign inversters in football clubs or any sport. The days of national achievement and pride has gone, I'd rather have Seria A for being Italian than having to sell your inheritence to another part of the world. They buy English Clubs because no one fights to keep them English and the rule Britania mentality for success has made Britania less a word to associate with it. They want to ban the Red cross logo because it might offend, they want to ban Jesus crosses in public buildings and graveyards because of political correctness. Next St.Georges flag will be the wrong statement and you would be made to feel guilty. Look Britain don't lose your soul to greed of success, I love Italian football, but if it ever got like England I won't support it.
  • Shane
    1. Ronaldo IS playing for the biggest club in the world.
    2. All talk of ANY knowledge based on nationality is racist. Know that.
    3. United isn't scared but 4th place Liverpool might be scratching their heads.
  • you cannot buy class.
  • sdfc
    manchester united, liverpool, and arsenal earned the money they make these days. it took years of work for them to be able to sign big players for big money. the chelsea and man city way of doing things is just hoping some billionare(s) come in and pump money into your club to get success without really earning it. don't try to compare those who earned their success with those who bought their success, you'll just end up looking stupid.
  • old apple
    We all know that love of the shirt is what feeds ronaldo, mascherano et al. Not the obscene paychecks their respective teams hand out.

    Man U, Chelsea and liverpool all attempt to buy the title and have been the big fish in the pond. Complaining when an even bigger fish moves in is just hypocrisy.
  • citeh fans, ask yourself one question.

    is robinho playing for the love of the man.city badge on his shirt, or for the man.city signature on his paycheck?

    in modern vernacular, it is simply called whoring.
  • Luisao
    Looks like Man City is the new Chelsea! I bet you Liverpool feel like a bunch of fucking idiots now!
  • Hmm... I think we paid like 10 million dollars on transfers this year.
  • brock
    dry your tears united fans!

    your days are numbered, we're out to getcha!

    BLUE MOON!!!
  • yeah yeah, "Yanks have no clue about football." We do know something about a few things that you are going to have to get acquainted with soon if you want to fix this mess. Things like collective bargaining, amateur drafts, salary caps, and revenue sharing. It might stink, but it keeps the billionaire speculators away.
  • Can we stop shouting at each other and talk about how the family behind the Citeh takeover has an estimated worth of 1 TRILLION DOLLARS. That is freakin awesome. Its like knowing a cheat code to have unlimted funds in FIFA or CM but its their real life.
  • Sam
    You Yanks have not got a clue about football have you? How have Man City spent £65 million on two players? Jo-£19M, Robinho-£32M, SWP-£9M, Zabaleta-£6M, Kompany-£6M, Berti-£3M - I think you will find that is £75M on 6 players now lets look at Utd - Rooney-£28M, Berba-£30M, Ferdi-£30M, Hargreaves-£19M, Tevez-£25M, Carrick-£18M, (yes I know they have not just bought them all now) I make that £150M on 6 Utd players there. And WHO is buying the league. Utd had one repeat ONE decent group of youngsters at the right time at the start of the Prem and that's it. Everything else was bought.

    Now there are bigger boys playing and you cant stand it!

    I fucking love it.
  • Jan
    @Bluenose: You are very pragmatic.

    And you are right, other clubs have and had (questionable) investors and live beyond their means etc. as well. Inter Milan aren't sustainable either and need Moratti's €€€. Just recently the Spanish government complained about over €600m in unpaid taxes and an undisclosed amount of social security payments from La Liga clubs. The same happened in Italy a while ago. Other clubs gamble on huge debts hoping to pay them off with success on the pitch. Clubs are working every angle everywhere to compete for glory. And it's all a big pile of shit. So sorry, for picking on Man City in particular this time around.

    But that's not the way I want European football to be in the future.
  • Ak
    Money corrupted football 40 years ago, and everyone from Chelsea, Real Madrid or AC Milan to FIFA has contributed to it: get over it. If you want to blame sombody, blame Adam Smith.
  • Bluenose
    Sorry to come back but that last one came up as I was going. 65 million on two players? 32.5 million on Robinho.... 19 was our other biggest on Jo = 51.5 million. Isn't that round about what Real Madrid paid for Zidane? Less than they offered for Ronaldo. What a joke. Where were you then?
  • Chippy
    "Reap The F---ing Whirlwind You Closed Shop Corporate G14 C---suckers" - pithily stated by Mr Lazeritis of Teh Vibe.
  • mele419
    City won't win anything.
    Throwing cash at a problem rarely solves it.
    Look at Chelsea.
    They still suck.
    And don't tell me they don't.
    Have they won anything recently? I think not.
  • nobobomo
    What a joke. Of course Man United have signed players at super high prices when nobody else could. It's wrong. You're just too caught up City to say that it's bad. Ask me any time if United has done some messed up stuff and I'll tell you yes every time. But if you think your club is somehow absolved of responsibility because everyone else has done similar stuff in the past then you're kidding yourself. Think about it, you just outbid CHELSEA. Also, I wouldn't list players and their costs because City just spent 65 million on two players in one transfer window. I won't excuse United for what they've done, but c'mon man, 65 million.
  • Bluenose
    It'll all end in disaster for City anyway... it always does. That's why we love it :)

    I'm done here. Sorry for being confrontational it's just that all over the internet everyone suddenly hates City for doing what Chelsea, Man Utd, Real Madrid, AC Milan etc etc have all done in the past. I'm at it again lol.

    Adios amigos.
  • Neil
    Evil Empire - My Ar$e, more like a breath of fresh air. The Premier league and the media have been dominated by the so called top four for too long. With poor old city being the butt of many a joke. If the new money knocks one of them off their perch - so what. It's called competition and you bet they will not like it one bit. So come on City it's time for a trophy, we've only waited 32 years! Although I think its going to be worth the wait.
  • Tony
    The point about Madrid was not that it should be done but that it was not new.Totally fucking up the league? That's just the point, it's been ok for the league to be dominated by the current big clubs total monopoly but when one of second tier clubs get a chance all of a sudden the League is totally fucked up!This will not be the last investment of it's type, QPR coming up soon and who knows who next? Saudi Royal family buying into Accrington Stanley? Great! We don't deserve it any more than some of the clubs mentioned above, but i'm glad one of us has got it!
  • mele419
    Wow.
    So many things in the football world are just incredibly disappointing to me lately..
  • Bluenose
    So Man Utd have fucked the league up? Rio Ferdinand(40 million), Hargreaves (18 million), Carrick (18 million), Anderson (18 million), Berbatov (30 million), Rooney (20 million) etc etc etc. Same for Chelsea... Liverpool... Arsenal (to a smaller extent). I really don't see where you're going with argument. Ferguson didn't build a side he bought it (only 4 homegrown regular players over the last few years I remember). My club isn't doing something bad for football... it's doing what everyone else has been doing but it has been unable to do. If anything all it is doing is catching up.
  • nobobomo
    So the arguement is that City deserve to be bankrolled to overnight success because Real was/is backed by the Spanish government? How is "Because Real got to do it!" a good excuse for totally fucking the league up? I don't blame you for wanted your club to be successful but wouldn't you rather see Hughes build a side that can compete at the highest level rather then buying eveyone elses players at 3 times their value? It's not a question of whether they deserve it or not, it's a question of whether or not you've got the stones to say that your own club is doing something really bad for football.
  • Bluenose
    @nobobomo

    Why don't we deserve it? Who deserves it? Most have the clubs have worked hard? Get your head out of the clouds. So no club has ever deserved investment... like Real Madrid being bankrolled by the bank on loans they never have to pay back. They deserve that? Why? Loyal fans? History? City have them too.
  • thrillhammer
    A lot of people pissed at city wanting a share of the big boys pie.If you all want a massive amount of cash to spend on players, get rich owners. Its funny though, i seem to have heard that its 92k a week. Its time for a change and were gonna be it................or at least for a couple of years before the game falls on its arse, which would have happened without citys help.

    Maybe we will get an office worker with a mortgage to buy us next time. LIVE WITH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Anyway im sure it will be fun for clubs to knock us down a peg or two. Lets not forget how man u's reign began, with a lot of cash pumped into the club.
  • Bluenose
    Sorry missed your other bits only caught the last bit cos was skimming...


    Through both rounds of the uefa we've played... 3rd in the league 1 point behind Chelsea... despite spending 40 million the summer before only making a 1 million loss for the year. The loan was taken knowing the takeover was coming to finance transfers. That doesn't sound like terrible shape to me.

    As for questioning the investors... Thaksin was the first democratically elected leader of Thailand not once but twice in succession. The poor of Thailand love him and the rich hated him. He was ousted in a military coup and the allegations are just that - allegations from people who other threw him illegally.

    The new owner I don't know much about but what I've heard is all good.
  • nobobomo
    "Real Madrid have been doing it for years… the italians did it in the early 90s… it’s our turn. It’s not the future… it’s the past.. present and the future."

    That's like the worst attitude towards football as a whole I think I've ever read. Most of the big clubs have worked really hard to get to where they are now and the presumption that City deserve to be the biggest, and richest club on the planet because they got the richest owners is totally ridiculous.
  • peter
    after tax it is 95 thousand and many more players an chavski and the scum earn more than that so have a go at them
  • Bluenose
    "This is supposed to be the only way how things in European football should work in the future?"

    Real Madrid have been doing it for years... the italians did it in the early 90s... it's our turn. It's not the future... it's the past.. present and the future.
  • Jan
    "I remember also watching a pre-season friendly where City confidently beat a pretty poor AC Milan side. What’s your point?"

    The point is that overall Man City were in bad shape. Not just in the friendly, but in the UEFA Cup etc. and financially as well. A picture which contrasts heavily with the new owners and the claim to be the biggest in the world.

    The point is also that City won't be able to pay wages of 160k per week for a crew of superstars, without their new investor. Like Chelsea they won't be sustainable. And this is absurd, considering the revenue the EPL generates.

    The point is that this is all a red light district where clubs go whoring for billionaires, who are willing to finance the spectacle. Wether those billionaires are on Amnesty Internationals most wanted list, did questionable business in post Cold war Russia, to get their hands on the countries valuable resource or whether they have been born on a patch of sand with a lot of oil underneath. It all doesn't matter because it gives a club a chance for a time in the sun?

    This is supposed to be the only way how things in European football should work in the future?
  • nobobomo
    I don't get it. Why wouldn't every club in the world hold out for City to spend a bazillion extra pounds on players? Announcing that you want every good player on the planet (except defenders) is like the fastest way to ruin future transfer negotiations I've ever heard of.

    Secondly, why didn't they just buy up the whole Premier League? That's what I would have done.
  • erhan yaman
    CITY ARE BACK WITH A BANG, MONEY NO PROBLEM?
  • Tony
    Well this is the sort of drivel we can come to expect as someone finally has a chance to compete with the big four.Correct me if i'm wrong but it seems it was fine for United to keep spending 25-30 million on players while anyone outside the top four couldn't come close. The big clubs in Italy and Spain have been funded by mega rich car companies or, in some cases, by their actual governments for much of their history. What about Real Madrid offering Ronaldo 200k a week, or Chelsea bidding 70m+ for Kaka? For the last 10 years nobody outside the big four got a look in. Clubs like Everton,Villa,Spurs,Newcastle,West Ham and City just haven't had a chance. I just hope some of the above get some major investment too. Iremember when i first heard of Abramovic buying Chelsea and it livened up what was becoming a stale 2 horse race every year between United and Arsenal. Yes i agree some of the comments are over the top and bit embarassing, but this league has burst into life and most fans outside the top four think it's bloody great!
  • Wigan Blue
    Don't you just love the whiff of sour grapes? Don't like it when it happens to you? Learn to live with it. The next 29 Championships? Why not? Got a player that might cause us trouble? Oops - we just bought him (Chelsea don't have a striker for their game at COMS a week on Sunday, and they certainly don't have a right winger). Titles? Prestige? Longevity? We have the last two in spades, and the first will come. What we don't have is a fanbase full of glory hunters. No, not a single one. Oh I know they'll come sniffing from Salford and up the M1 now. I'm told the season ticket lines broke down under the number of enquiries. But we have to expect this kind of thing now we're the biggest club...
  • Nate
    This is why I don't watch the EPL, I hate oligarchies.
  • Nelly
    Couldn't of put it better. Most of us are jealous at the amount of money that citeh have now got, but put it into perspective the blue of Manchester have sold their soul to the Devil. No amount of money is going to give a club its soul back, just look at Chelsea. Titles and cups are great, but when you've got a twat like Kenyon and spoilt russian who is so out of touch with the real world then I would rather not be a part of it.
    Anyway, I bet Robhino puts in a transfer request in January when he gets bored with the blue devils and goes to chelski.
  • Bluenose
    I remember also watching a pre-season friendly where City confidently beat a pretty poor AC Milan side. What's your point?

    We were already the biggest spenders in the premier league before the takeover and the Robinho deal but nobody cared then. Despite spending 40 million last season we only made a lost of 1.5 million for the year too.

    My point is for two years in a row before the takeover we were the biggest spenders but nobody cared then. Now we have all this new backing everyone suddenly jumps on the same 'it's turning into a joke... I remember when the football mattered' band wagon. To me it all smacks of jealousy and bitterness. The amount of hard times City have gone through and false dawns it's about time we had our time in the sun. The fans deserve it. Tell me any other club that would still get over 30,000 fans week in week out in the third tier of there national league. I for one don't care one bit if we 'buy' the league. It's been like that for over 20 years since Jack Walker bought the league for Blackburn in 1994/1995. I just see it as our turn. It won't last forever but I'll enjoy it while it lasts.
  • Rob
    I have no idea what you just said there Lissette.
  • Lissette Evil Blue
    WTF we will be biggest club in the world in a billion(trillion) years
    The are The BIGGEST BANK ACCOUNT FC on the EPL ok Do they think that will be as easy as stealing ROBITCHNHO from Chelsea. Ok the Guy Its on CRACK and its whorst than Adrian Mutu's case. Guess now I'll have somebody else to hate.
  • Rob
    Is that 160k before or after tax? Because it makes a big big difference here in the UK if its before tax.
  • Jan
    Brilliant. I remember watching a pre-season friendly where Hamburg confidently beat a pretty poor Man City side. Hamburg selling Vincent Kompany to them looked like an act of charity. The club had financial difficulties, was almost knocked out of the UEFA Cup by a Danish side, took out a loan on future TV income and now it's the biggest club in the world all of a sudden.

    Bizarre. The Premier League already generates the most money and still needs the absolute richest people and entities of the world to give them their oil and gas money to keep those clubs from getting bankrupt.

    Happy. There are other places in the world, where they play football as well. :-)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           



World Cup 2010 News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives