Pele: Mr. Blatter, tear down that wall

By: Bob | November 8th, 2007

You know the routine by now. Every couple of months Pele emerges from the shadows, stands in front of a microphone, and pontificates on soccer issues that he may or may not know anything about. He’s like a moth drawn to light. Yesterday, the man who earned the nickname the King for something other than his insightful commentary made headlines for questioning how MLS sold David Beckham to the American populace. Whatever. What I found more interesting was Pele’s idea for a possible rule change to improve the sport.

The man who made a living scoring goals wants goal scoring to become easier by banning teams from using defensive walls.

‘The forward gets the ball from the midfield, dribbles for one-two or passes three or four players but when you get close to the goal, the last defender makes a foul.

‘After you have passed all the players, one guy makes a foul and then you have the whole team in the wall against you again. It is not fair.

‘It is one rule I don’t understand, as a forward, why they didn’t ban.’

I don’t think I have ever heard of anyone else advocating for a wall ban and I don’t think there would be too many keepers who would endorse it. But if you are looking for something to increase the goal scoring – something that I don’t really think is necessary – this would be one way to do it.

What do you think? Is Pele nuts or would you like to see this implemented?

Category: World Football

Tags: Pele, Rules Changes, Walls, World Football, World Soccer

« Not exactly the Sexy Football the LA Galaxy had in mind | Home | Jose Mourinho is a schoolyard bully »

Subscribe   The Offside RSS Feeds

Print

Share

Comments  

• celtic bhoy |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:00 am

  
  
  

  complete rubbish ! Pele was a great player and feel bad bashing him but come on ban the wall … really ? maybe we should increase the size of the goal by 10 yards too or ban the sweeper

  Posted from United States

  

• Johnathan |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:23 am

  
  
  

  No, he’s just nuts.

  Posted from United States

  

• angelo |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:40 am

  
  
  

  shut up u haters. hows it like growing up with almost no food in the favelas of brasil. they didnt even have shoes to play with back then. he is a legend and has gone through many criticisms throughout his career so have respect. im brasilian and proud to be one b/c of him. its a good idea for americans to get into the sport b/c they like more goals but bad for keepers. i dont know

  Posted from United States

  

• Shane |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:48 am

  
  
  

  He has a point. Maybe look into changing it so the wall only consists of the player who committed the foul and every player of his that was behind or level with him. That way you don’t have a striker and an attacking mid comin back who had no part in that play to begin with.

  Posted from United States

  

• Ian |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:49 am

  
  
  

  I’m not going to say a bad word about Pele - I’m with Angelo. Even if it’s not the best idea for implementation, legends get to tell us what they think. I love the sport as it is, and the only rule change I would implement would be goal line technology and harsher penalties for diving. But still, it’s freaking Pele. The man could tell me the sky was green and I’d look twice.

  Posted from United States

  

• Jan |  November 8th, 2007 at 11:59 am

  
  
  

  I think Oliver Kahn once said, that he could at least see the ball coming without a wall in his line of sight, which might sometimes even help save it.

  Posted from Germany

  

• joejoejoe |  November 8th, 2007 at 12:09 pm

  
  
  

  Getting ‘close to the goal’ isn’t the object of the game. I know at lower levels players routinely break behind the defense only to have their touch betray them and the keeper come out to snatch the ball off their feet. Awarding an unimpeded free kick outside the box to any striker who gets fouled assumes a) that the striker is going to maintain possession at a full run and b) be cool and coordinated enough to get a shot off. Neither of these assumptions are generally true.

  That said Pele has a point. That’s why they award penalty kicks for fouls in the box.

  Posted from United States

  

• Andy @ Liquid Football |  November 8th, 2007 at 5:04 pm

  
  
  

  It would liven up the game (more goals), and perhaps it would be more fair to the attacking team if there were onyl players behind the ball, but I fear it would be too difficult to implement.

  If we love the beautiful game, we should just leave it as it is.

  Posted from United Kingdom

  

• finnegan |  November 8th, 2007 at 6:28 pm

  
  
  

  angelo, no one is criticizing pele’s footballing ability or his upbringing or brasil or anything like that. we’re merely saying that banning the wall in football is a stupid thing to do, it has no basis.

  Posted from United States

  

• Cerberus |  November 8th, 2007 at 9:17 pm

  
  
  

  I think the keeper is also unfair to the strikers. I mean, you weave past all the defenders and then there’s this guy standing right in the net who can even use his hands. Talk about an unfair advantage!

  On a more serious note, yes, Pele is a great striker, but he is a great STRIKER. Of course he is biased in the favor of goalscorers. He’s a goalscorers. If you asked a defender what they wanted to see changed, they’d probably argue in favor of more defense-based improvements.

  Pretending that there isn’t a bias at work in his statement is doing him a disfavor. Yes, he’s great, but it’s no surprise that the most nuanced and balanced perspectives on the game tend to come from midfielders.

  Posted from United States

  

• Franco |  November 10th, 2007 at 7:34 am

  
  
  

  What a ridiculous idea.
  If this was anyone else I’d ridicule them immensely and brand them as an idiot. However due to my unbreakable respect and love for Pele I’ll simply say… Not one of your best Ideas.

  Posted from United States

  

Comments are closed