Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho.

By: chris | August 11th, 2008

Say you’re playing a video game. Or even better yet, say you’re Roman Abramovich and your entire life is nothing more than a video game with the world at your fingertips. You’ve got a ruble tree in the backyard and your new coach has decided that he wants just one more player to complete his squad, which means there’s essentially no price which cannot be met. And with the never ending search for joga bonito still at the forefront, you’ve set your sites on two uber-flashy Brazilian attackers. So, who do you go for: Kaka or Robinho?

On the pitch the edge would have to go to Kaka. The Ballon D’Or committee may be a bit, uh, imperfect, but winning a Golden Ball still means quite a bit. (Not to mention the Champions League run which essentially won him that BDO.) Robinho is obviously very, very good, with the potential to be even better, but their value is represented in their transfer tags fairly appropriately: Kaka somewhere waaaaaaaaay over €50m – with some rumors mentioning an insane 9 figures – and Robinho somewhere under €50m.

And that’s where it gets tricky. Kaka may be the better player right now, but he’s got a few factors working both against himself and for Robinho. Price is obviously one. With the right transfer guru you could buy a damn good team with the scratch you’d save “downsizing” from Kaka to Robinho – and that’s before we talk salary. Age is another, with Robinho having two years on his elder.

Now we’ve got Kaka’s issues with his knee, the long term effects of which no one is really predicting with any confidence right now. How would you like to spend the GDP of Estonia on a player only to see him limp through the first few months – or even years – of his contract? No thanks.

Then, of course, there’s off the field. What do you think the chances are Kaka would ask a security guard for 40 condoms unless he was about to hand them out in a sex ed class which he was teaching at the local high school? Slim and none. The only way he’s going to get into off the field trouble in London is by asking the wrong stranger on the street “Can I talk to you about Jesus?” and becoming the victim of assault and battery. Robinho? Wouldn’t exactly rule it out. Actually, I can already sense the Daily Mail salivating from across the pond.

Both would likely go – Robinho hasn’t exactly been subtle about it, and someone in the Kaka camp spilled the beans about his willingness recently – and both clubs will more than likely say “alright, we’d just be imbeciles to turn this down” at some point, making a deal workable. So if you’re Big Boss and Peter Kenyon, who do you throw your money at?

I’d buy…
( polls)



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games


Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho. digg:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho. reddit:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho. fark:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho. Y!:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho. stumbleupon:Playing Director: Kaka or Robinho.

Comments  

  • Aravind |  August 11th, 2008 at 8:41 am

    cornercorner

    Chelsea certainly doesn’t need another attacking midfielder. So, Robinho it must be.

    Posted from India India

    cornercorner
  • Laurie |  August 11th, 2008 at 8:44 am

    cornercorner

    I voted Robinho. The Kaka knee thing would worry me too much to spend that kind of money.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • cap123 |  August 11th, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    cornercorner

    i’d go robinho because we need a winger, and he’s also be useful as playing just behind drogba like he does for brazil.

    Bringing kaka would probably upset our other more narrow midfielders, but if lampard doesn’t extend his contract (and even maybe ballack), we could always go for him next year if he and ac milan havent patched things up.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • kovolikessoccer |  August 11th, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    cornercorner

    Robinho is the clear choice. I don’t know why there would be any discussion otherwise.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Finnegan |  August 11th, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    cornercorner

    I’d go with robinho. kaka is capable of amazing things, but nothing that chelsea is already capable of. sure, he carries the ball well but that isn’t what we’re looking for, especially with scolari’s new style of play being imposed on the squad. what we need is someone who can give us width and attacking prowess in the final third and around the net. robinho provides that, and while he’s not a prolific scorer, he scores some magnificent goals and can definitely provide for drogba or any other forward.

    2004-2005 and 2005-2006 premier league titles were won because of chelsea’s style of “power football” under mourinho, and part of executing that power is having flying wings – having lost damien duff and robben from those seasons, we need to find it in someone else. and robinho is the winger, not kaka.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Moka |  August 12th, 2008 at 4:44 am

    cornercorner

    Yea, def. Robinho is the guy for Chelsea..

    Posted from Kuwait Kuwait

    cornercorner
  • James |  August 12th, 2008 at 7:31 am

    cornercorner

    Haha, it’s at exactly 50/50 :D !

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News
Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives