

Poll: Which is the Best Tie-breaker for Two Teams Level on Points?
By: Daryl | May 18th, 2009Before we move on to the poll, check out the above bit of drama from Belgium’s First Division.
Top two teams Anderlecht and Standard Liege were level on points and level on games won (the first tie-breaker in Belgium) going into the final day of the season. So if Anderlecht and Standard both won their final games then we’d have ourselves a playoff to decide the title.
Anderlecht did the business with a 2-0 win over KRC Genk. Standard found things a little more tricky. They were 1-0 away to KAA Gent with the final whistle approaching, but man-mountain American defender Oguchi Onyewu fouled Gent’s Miloš Marić in the box to give away a late pen. If you’ve already watched the video, then you know what happens next.
Standard keeper Sinan Bolat saved Bryan Ruiz’ penalty, meaning there’ll now be a playoff for the Belgian title. Instead of sleepless nights for Oguchi Onyewu.
The playoff will be home and away, in Brussels on 21st May and in Liege on the 24th.
Should be exciting. I like the idea of a playoff to sort out situations like this. I also like the first Belgian tie-breaker, which is number of games won. It’s the same method used in the Russian Premier League (I think). The obvious downside is that the other team may have suffered fewer defeats (and picked up points through draws). It shouldn’t really matter how you get your points, so long as you get them.
Obviously the two other most popular methods (not used in Belgium, but used extensively elsewhere) are goal difference (England, Germany) and head to head points (Italy, Spain), which each have their pros and cons. Goal difference takes into account the whole season, but allows a situation where Team A beats Team B twice in the season, but can still finish lower on goal difference.
Head to head points solves that problem by focusing solely on games between those teams, and might seem the fairest way to split two teams who otherwise can’t be split. But you could also argue that a league table should reflect the whole season, rather than just two games.
List of which leagues use which tie-breakers can be found here.
Obviously no system is perfect. So here’s the poll question: Which of the following is the best tie-breaker for two teams level on points? If you answer “other” then please elaborate in the comments.
![]() |
Soccer Forums | Team/International Results | |||
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Goal difference, encourages entertaining football.
Posted from
United States

-



head-to-head. Goal difference is disadvantageous to defensive minded teams.
Posted from
India

-



disadvantageous? spell that 5 times fast

i think goal difference because anything can happen in one game, but there are relatively little excuses for doing bad a whole season. plus, beating a rival is great, but beating the average mid-table team consistently is vital.Posted from
United States

-



I like head to head. If your level with a team in the table, you see which team was better against each other to see who should have the advantage.
Posted from
United States

-



Funny thing is, Ruiz is in contract talks with both Anderlecht and Standard. Anderlecht-player Jelle Van Damme already promised to break Ruiz’ nose if he signs for Standard.
Posted from
Belgium

-



In leagues in which everybody plays everybody else home and away (most European leagues) – goal differential. Everybody has the same schedule and it gives you 30, 34, 38, etc. games to work it out.
In leagues where the schedules are uneven (MLS comes to mind) – head-to-head because strength of schedule may benefit one of the clubs, so goal differential may be disadvantageous (I’m going to use that word over and over today) to one of the clubs.
Posted from
United States

-



An anything goes cage match between the entire squads inc. Managers, Ass Mans, physios, and youth team. Team of the last man standing wins!
Posted from
India

Comments are closed











