Seattle Player “Promotion,” Again

By: Laurie | March 2nd, 2008

sounders.jpgI’ve talked before on this page about how the Seattle Sounders USL team have gotten permission to move some of their best players from the Sounders team up to the MLS team next year. Theoretically the two entities are unrelated, but since the owner of the Sounders, Adrian Hanauer, is a part-owner of the new MLS franchise, there were always going to be some links. The question was what those links would look like.

My source article here is over a month old, but it’s an interesting and slightly more in-depth look at how the Seattle Sounders are using their status as a USL team to pick up players for next year’s Seattle MLS team.

When I looked at this issue awhile back, the rumor was that the Seattle MLS team could keep 6-8 Sounders players. This article says that they can keep any and all of them.

“Everything we do, we certainly have one eye on MLS in 2009,” Hanauer said, adding that MLS Seattle can keep as many Sounders as it wants, as long as those players’ rights aren’t controlled by another MLS team.

I’m a little surprised by these numbers. Last month’s rumor of 5-8 players seemed very reasonable. Now it’s as many as they want? I haven’t seen this anywhere else, but if it’s true? What an advantage over your standard expansion team.

I’m surprised I haven’t heard any protests, either from MLS sides or from the USL sides, over the advantage this could give Seattle in recruiting. Especially since last year’s USL Sounders weren’t exactly slackers, even without the promise of MLS to dangle over the players’ heads. The team won both the Supporter’s Shield and the Cup. They also beat Chivas USA 3-1 and the Colorado Rapids 5-0 in the Open Cup before losing to FC Dallas in extra time.

Brian Schmetzer, the current Sounders coach, was at the Combine this year, scouting players along with all the MLS coaches. The goal was to get the pick of the litter of players who weren’t chosen in the MLS SuperDraft, or to get an idea of which players they liked, in case those players were drafted but later cut by the MLS team.

Schmetzer scouted and interviewed prospective players as always, but he had a bargaining chip with MLS hopefuls — the chance, after this season with the Sounders, to stick around and play for the MLS franchise that begins play in Seattle in 2009.

Thanks to a negotiated clause in its ownership agreement, MLS Seattle — of which Hanauer is a part-owner — has the right of first negotiation with any player who didn’t get selected in Friday’s MLS SuperDraft and joins the Sounders this year. That means the club can get the first shot at keeping that player if it wants him for the new franchise.

“We’re a hot USL franchise right now,” Schmetzer said, “There was quite a bit of a buzz going on about that at the combine.”

As a new Seattle season ticket holder, I’m very curious to see how this all plays out, both this year in USL and next year in MLS.

(Photo from GoalSeattle.com)




Category Category: MLS, World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Seattle Player  digg:Seattle Player  reddit:Seattle Player  fark:Seattle Player  Y!:Seattle Player  stumbleupon:Seattle Player

Comments  

  • GOALSeattle.com |  March 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    cornercorner

    Since that article was published the Sounders announced the re-signing of their entire 2007 championship starting line-up, all except winger Josh Gardner.

    Meanwhile, I’ve been told by Adrian Hanauer to expect a stream of foreign talent to be in Seattle for invitational tryouts throughout March.

    Looks like some of those Sounders pre-season matches could have some new, exotic faces in them.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Johonna |  March 3rd, 2008 at 10:40 am

    cornercorner

    I am signed up for season tickets for the MLS team, but have not been to a sounders game.

    I, too, am interested to see what will happen. I would love to have a viable team here in Seattle. Maybe the other MLS teams are not saying much because it is better for the league as a whole to have more teams.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Johonna |  March 3rd, 2008 at 11:41 am

    cornercorner

    I did find this rumor:
    http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/41970

    So who knows. Seattle FC? AC Seattle?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • N |  March 3rd, 2008 at 11:50 am

    cornercorner

    Just like Seattle: always cheating.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Cap Ap |  March 3rd, 2008 at 11:55 am

    cornercorner

    Ah, your usual crap tactics from Seattle…why would anyone be surprised? It should surprise me that the USL doesn’t step in on this ’cause I don’t see how it benefits the league in any possible way but it doesn’t.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Jon |  March 3rd, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    cornercorner

    Seattle FC? AC Seattle??

    “What’s your soul worth,
    what’s your soul worth,
    what’s your soul worth, Sounders fans?
    I don’t need one,
    never had one,
    I’m just here for the marching band.”

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Lucas |  March 3rd, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    cornercorner

    Drew Carey killed a guy once and paid a guy to cover it up.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Johonna |  March 3rd, 2008 at 11:57 pm

    cornercorner

    Er, I guess I am totally missing something. I am not a Sounders fan. I am a fan of the Italian Serie A and thought it might be kinda cool to have our own MSL team so I bought some tickets for a team THAT DOESNT EVEN EXIST YET. Based on that, I hardly think they can be cheaters.

    If the sounders are known for crap tactics, it is entirely new to me. If you followed the link, the article said that the new team would be named something “classic” and having to do with “international football.” That is where the two names came from. Yikes! I have a soul, thank you very much, and I am not overly fond of marching bands.

    Are you all against expansion on principal, or do you just not want the competition?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Johonna |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:00 am

    cornercorner

    and I meant principle, not principal! Damn homonym.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • N |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:10 am

    cornercorner

    Johonna, the club does currently exist. The club will have many of the same players as the current USL team and the club will have many of the same owners. It just so happens that this organization has a less than stellar history when it comes to following rules, displaying sportsmanship and being decent human beings.

    And don’t feel bad about thinking this team doesn’t exist. Look at Seattle’s soccer attendence records and you’ll find that most of Seattle doesn’t think this team exists.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Jon |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:42 am

    cornercorner

    The name Sounders has 30 years of soccer cultural and historical tradition. Culture, history and tradition are cool and important. At least I think so. But for Seattle fans to simply bend over and take it so easily in the name of Drew Carey and his high school pep band by becoming FC Seattle or whatever dumb name/colors the league decides, thereby actively discarding thirty years of soccer history and tradition as if it doesn’t exist… yes, is indeed selling one’s soccer soul. Hence, the song about Sounders fans.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Lucas |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    cornercorner

    I still have nightmares about the time roger levesque threatened my life.

    Have you ever seen Seattle play with class?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Johonna |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    cornercorner

    I know there are the Sounders (which will continue as an organization, I think). But the MSL team has not officially been formed. The “tickets” I bought are simply placeholders until next year. I dont think they have any official players yet, at least that is what the web page says.

    So do you think Seattle should not get an MLS team? Or should they just promote the Sounders as a unit?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Lucas |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    cornercorner

    “So do you think Seattle should not get an MLS team? Or should they just promote the Sounders as a unit?”

    I think they should do a “Kingdome Kaboom” on qwest field, with the sounders inside.

    They’re flat, they’re round, they flop on the ground.
    seattle flounders

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Laurie |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    cornercorner

    Johonna, just fyi, this site is inhabited by a small but vocal group of hardcore Portland fans. We tend to get along on most other topics, but on the Seattle-Portland thing there is a bit of…um…banter and we must agree to disagree.

    P.S. Wicks to LA…. :-)

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Lendog |  March 6th, 2008 at 12:39 am

    cornercorner

    When the Portland fans outnumber the Flounder fans in their home this season what will their excuse be?

    Posted from Kuwait Kuwait

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners
17 C.RONALDO PORTUGAL AWAY WHITE SOCCER JERSEY (SZ ...
Price: $22.99
100% Soft-touch, high-sheen polyester fabric with ...
Price: $5.99
Old Navy Baby: He may not have a team to root for ...
Price: $2.99

Powered by

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives