

Should MLS increase the number of designated players per team?
By: Bob | September 28th, 2007
In addition to the Seattle to MLS rumors circulating around the interwebs, I have seen a number of mentions this week about the possibility of the league allowing all the teams to have a second designated player on their roster. The basic idea being that an additional designated player slot would allow teams to continue to attract new talent to the league and to keep some of the higher paid existing players where they are. Is this a good idea?
On paper it is hard to argue with it. By allowing teams to open up their checkbooks, MLS has added David Beckham, Denilson, Claudio Reyna, CuauhtĂ©moc Blanco and Juan Pablo Angel into the fold. These are players who have generated fan excitement. In the case of Blanco and Angel they have also elevated their teams’ level of play. An additional designated player could only serve to do the same. Better players + increased fan interest = better league. Simple as that, right?
Well, you can also argue that an additional designated player spot is not only unnecessary but it could potentially hurt teams. If you look at the number of teams actually using a designated player spot you see only 4 out of 13. You see that having a designated player does not guarantee on the field success and you see that not having one doesn’t guarantee on the field failure. An additional high priced player means additional costs and less room to maneuver under the salary cap. It means that teams like the Galaxy could end up with Beckham, Landon Donovan and a bunch of minimum wage players as their supporting cast. Would that necessarily improve the product on the field?
What do you think? Should the league allow for an additional designated player on each team or is one enough?
Some Related Stories:
Subscribe
|
-
Diane
-
Nick
-
pate
-
Nik
-
Gianfranco









