

The 20 Richest Teams in the World in 2008
By: chris | February 11th, 2009
It’s time for the yearly Deloitte rankings, which display the revenue each clubs earns from the past calendar year (2008 here, Rip Van Winkle). There are zero surprises in the top ten – it’s all England, Spain and Italy – and there’s even less of a surprise as to who’s tops (it begins with Real and ends with Madrid), but there are a few surprises in store: mainly why is the bottom half of the Prem table well-represented and where’s the Bundesmoney coming from? Oh, and Spain appears to be a bit more financially unstable than initially thought, because outside of a certain two teams, they’re nowhere to be found.
The list, courtesy of Corriere dello Sport, in millions of euros (€).
1. Real Madrid 365,8
2. Manchester United 324,8
3. Barcelona 308,8
4. Bayern Munich 295,3
5. Chelsea 268,9
6. Arsenal 264,4
7. Liverpool 210,9
8. Milan 209,5
9. Roma 175,4
10. Inter 172,9
11. Juventus 167,5
12. Olympique Lyonnais 155,7
13. Schalke 04 148,4
14. Tottenham 145
15. Hamburg 127,9
16. Olympique Marseille 126,8
17. Newcastle 125,6
18. Stuttgart 11,5
19. Fenerbahce 111,3
20. Manchester City 104
The 2007 list can be found here for comparison and the 2006 edition here.
Finally, Real Madrid fans can breathe a sigh of relief – for once this year they’ve overtaken Barca in something.
Obviously doing well in the Champions League the previous year does wonders for one’s revenue (see: Fenerbahce) – and watch Juventus rocket up those standings next year – while wearing lederhosen and enjoying a fine ale is also a big bonus – as is the case with Mike Ashley.
The Premiership is well represented, obviously – mainly because the EPL is run by a bunch of useless swindlers only concerned with making a buck – but the Prem is still massively in debt and could soon find itself where Italian find themselves after their years of financial gorging (cycles, baby, cycles).
What’s also interesting is that the plummet of the pound has devalued some rankings; if it hadn’t gone all Olympic diver on us there would be nine teams instead of seven from Ingerland and ManU would top the rankings, not Real. So there, blame the pound.
Each situation is wildly different – i.e. Roma’s parent company is €350m in debt and needs most of that cash to keep collectors off the front steps of the Olimpico, whereas Man City might blow the whole of their bounty on a squad player for the reserves – but it’s certainly true that being on this list goes a great deal in helping teams keep a hold on Champions League spots and fend off the less financially fortunate. As ever, the rich get richer….
![]() |
Soccer Forums | Team/International Results | |||
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Chris, I love the pic. Alternative tittle – Who made it Rain last year.
Posted from
United States

-



Chris, kudos on the pic. Do you know if Deloitte releases information about the rest of the world? I read their PDF report this morning, really interesting, but is there any information on the clubs not included in the top 20. I’m assuming no, but it would be awesome if somebody could find something.
Posted from
Canada

-



I’d imagine they have to go significantly outside of the top 20 for this rating to have credibility, but couldn’t tell you where to find it – and a Deloitte PDF sounds about the best place. I do know Forbes releases something similar in April/May but they only do 25.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Soccer-Team-Valuations_Value.html
Posted from
United States

-



I can’t say where all the Bundesmoney is coming from, but Bayern Munich’s sudden jump to 4th place in the ranking has to do with the Allianz Arena, which they operated with a junior partner (1860 Munich) through a parent company. 1860 Munich had to back out, since it was still too much of an economic burden for them, so Bayern bought their shares. Now owning the Allianz Arena 100% allowed them to publish a combined and much higher yearly financial result. Though, they owned 88% of the stadium before, so you might question how distorted this list actually is.
While you can have some doubts about Deloitte, the Forbes list is definitely a highly uneducated hack.
Posted from
Germany

-



Thanks for the link Chris, I was just curious first of all how Greek clubs (such as my beloved Olympiacos) fair in such valuations, but also clubs like CSKA Moscow, Zenit St. Petersburg, River Plate, and Boca Juniors; you know the traditional powerhouses in leagues of lower interest.
Posted from
Canada

-



Oh word? I make it rain on them hoes too.
Posted from
United States

-



Who were the other 2 english clubs who would have made the list?
Posted from
United States

-



Mike, you make it rain but I make it snow.
REMIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now where your bar at?
I’m tryna rent it out
And we so bout it bout it
Now what are you about?
DJ show me love
He say my name when the music stop
Young Money Lil Wayne
Then the music drop
I make it snow
I make it flurry
………The revenue doesn’t mean anything. It don’t mean nothing.
Posted from
United States

-



valancia didn’t make it
OM and OL are continuing to rise
EPL no suprises except man city
seria A no surprises either
Posted from
United States

-



I am sure that Juve’s peppy season is feather in a cap worthy aping.The Ranieri magic is wont to oversee big cash mellifluously drain into the Biancinneri bank account.Watch out haters!
Posted from
United States

-



to me i think arsenal is th erichest club in the world check out the stadium emirate after th elong time crises yhe club, management, players and even their fans are just too wonderfull.
Posted from
Israel

-



omonoia je kani re shelionia. JUVE+BARCA+OLYMPIAKOS PIREUS
Posted from
United States

-



OMONOIA REEEEEEEEEE! GAMO TO APOEL.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed











