The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League

By: chris | November 5th, 2009

Par2875899They must fall.

And so four games in, the Champions League contenders and pretenders have been separated fallen into place for the group stage which, a few spots aside, could’ve been drawn up in August by a blind chimp and his serf, a man who tans.

Breaking down the likelies, unlikelies, and those who are already dreaming of Europa Cup quasi-glory:

We’ll begin with the impossibilities, as championing those who’ve already qualified would be oh so positive. Who needs joy when misery is at the ready?

The eliminated (points):

Maccabi Haifa (0)
Besiktas (1)
APOEL (1)
Atletico (2)
Debrecen (0)

All highly likely to depart early aside from Atletico, who’ve plummeted into travshamockery territory.

And would anyone like to chart a geographical map of those participants? Anyone? Anyone at all?

On the brink (pts):


Bayern (4):
It’s less about the points they need and more that they loss back-to-back to Bordeaux. They suck.
Zurich (3): Mathematically still alive, losing 6-1 to Marseille registers you for bottom of the group after day 6. This before mentioning Real Madrid and Milan are in the group.
Liverpool (4): Clearly this is just not The Year of Liverpool. But to be fair, if Lyon don’t roll over for Fiorentina, they have a real shot if they can thrash la viola at Anfield. (Assuming Project Debrecen goes well – as it should).

To be even more fair, needing other results to go your way by Matchday 5 isn’t exactly promising.

And finally, the qualified (pts):

Bordeaux (yay)
ManU (yay)
Chelsea (yay)
Porto (yay)
Lyon (yay)
Sevilla (yay)
Arsenal (yay)

cl4

Groups, in a sentence or two:

Group A:
Can Bayern beat the Old Lady in her home on the final matchday? At this point, I’m not sure they could sufficiently beat an old lady in a home invasion.

Group B:
Wide open; CSKA must have a sense of belief after Wednesday while Wolfsburg must travel to Moscow and host ManU.

Group C:
Regardless of how it happens – likely through some weird leathery hybrid of Pippo, Ruud and Raul – Real & Milan will go through. Chalk it up to ‘pedigree’ (but not Pellegrini).

Group D:
Carlo Ancelotti in Europe, ladies & gents.

Group E:
A qualified Lyon traveling to Florence should weaken the Merseyside knees; yet a mere draw from Lyon and…Rafa Benitez in Europe, ladies & gents.

Group F:
Cluster. Fuck. Flip a coin; flip a hat; flip your lid. Who knows.

Group G:
Platini needs to amend the rules such that top and bottom from Group F swap places with two from G – this thing is the red-headed step-child of the Champions League. (I vote the STD on name alone.)

Group H:
Or maybe just scrap second place from G & H in order to award all four spots to Group F. (Olympiacos, based solely on experience, would seem to have the clear advantage. That and two extra points.)



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games



Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League digg:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League reddit:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League fark:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League Y!:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League stumbleupon:The Haves, Have-Nots & Never-Hads of the Champions League

Comments   |  Add your comment

  • Tommy Wong |  November 5th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    cornercorner

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v291/wanganator/chrismap.png

    my boredom is your gain.

    took about 40321302 hours in paint.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • chris |  November 5th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    cornercorner

    You rock, Tommy Wong.

    Lesson for the day: being from southeast Europe does not equal Champions League glory.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • laurie |  November 5th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    cornercorner

    That i an AWESOME map!!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Mark Chalcraft |  November 5th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    cornercorner

    Interesting run-down. I’m not sure that Madrid are going to have it so easy. Or maybe that’s just some kind of anti-galactico wishful thinking.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner
  • Thomas |  November 5th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    cornercorner

    Since when does losing to Bordeaux mean you suck? They could honestly challenge any team in Europe at the moment.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Gordon |  November 5th, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    cornercorner

    I agree with Thomas. You make Bordeaux sound like Hull.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Al |  November 6th, 2009 at 8:52 am

    cornercorner

    Save your anti-Fiorentina comments pal- no accounting for sore losers.
    VIVA VIOLA PER SEMPRE!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • vespo |  November 6th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    cornercorner

    so basically your odds of qualifying for the second round decrease as your distance from london increases…

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Leave a Reply

If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse our
Commenting Guidelines.


World Cup 2010 News
Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives