The High Cost of being a WAG

By: Bob | November 15th, 2006

wags.jpgI’ll admit that I was largely ambivalent about the Wives and Girlfriends (WAGs) phenomenon at this year’s World Cup. Every time they showed pictures of the women in the stands I felt compelled to hold a Live Aid type of concert to raise money to fill their anemic bodies with high calorie milkshakes. I’m even less interested in the WAGs now that I have taken a test put together by Virgin Money (clearly they are doing God’s work) to determine the likelihood that I could end up a WAG. I ended up scoring so low that it is likely I’d need to pay a Conference player just to talk to me. In other words, the test was very accurate.

Not satisfied with just putting together a WAG eligibility Web site, Virgin Money has also come up with the estimated costs of being a WAG.

It will cost aspiring footballers’ wives an initial investment of £28,815 to win their perfect match and then a spend of £21,855 in year-one of the relationship, to keep their footballer from playing away. The elements identified by Virgin Money to make up the initial investment are:

- The obligatory boob job - £5,750
- Designer wardrobe - £7,050
- Body conditioning - £9,360
- Being seen in the correct places - £2,480
- Makeover - £1,465
- Accessories - £2,710

Ongoing expenses in the first year (at least) to keep the WAGs at the top of their games, according to Virgin Money, will be:

- Hair care - £6,120 a year
- Gym membership/personal trainer - £5,460 a year
- Nails - £650 per year
- Tan - £1,820 a year
- Clothes - at least £6,740 per year
- Alcohol - £490 per year
- Trendy club membership - £575 a year

For those WAGs willing to set their sights a little lower, Virgin Money estimates that a Championship player’s heart can be won over for £31,400, a League 1 player for £15,250 and a League 2 player for £5,140. Right at the other end of the spectrum, girls can bag a typical non-League Conference player for somewhere in the region of £512, the research from Virgin Money concludes.

I think I lost at least 20 IQ points posting this.

Via [4TheGame]




Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:The High Cost of being a WAG digg:The High Cost of being a WAG reddit:The High Cost of being a WAG fark:The High Cost of being a WAG Y!:The High Cost of being a WAG stumbleupon:The High Cost of being a WAG

Comments  

  • Peter |  November 15th, 2006 at 12:33 pm

    cornercorner

    I’m not sure which is worse. The fact I actually took the WAG test or the fact I scored pretty high on it. I need to find a new job :-)

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • YNBA |  November 16th, 2006 at 6:13 am

    cornercorner

    I’m not ashamed to say, I love all the WAG nonsense. The bling! The fake tans! They’re like very shiny trainwrecks waiting to happen!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Horzo |  November 17th, 2006 at 5:22 pm

    cornercorner

    I have to disagree with the cost estimates. Any wannabe WAG worth her salt should be able to get her chosen hoofer to pick up her expenses within the first six months - which, I would have thought, is the point of becoming a WAG to begin with.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives