Comments on: The Matuzalém Ruling, or: Why Webster is not the New Bosman http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/the-matuzalem-ruling-or-why-webster-is-not-the-new-bosman.html League Football, Soccer News and Views from Around the World Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:06 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Tom http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/the-matuzalem-ruling-or-why-webster-is-not-the-new-bosman.html/comment-page-1#comment-145225 Tom Thu, 21 May 2009 01:07:18 +0000 http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/the-matuzalem-ruling-or-why-webster-is-not-the-new-bosman.html#comment-145225 He has a tattoo of his own name. On his neck. What a knob. He has a tattoo of his own name. On his neck. What a knob.

]]> By: martin http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/the-matuzalem-ruling-or-why-webster-is-not-the-new-bosman.html/comment-page-1#comment-145224 martin Thu, 21 May 2009 01:05:48 +0000 http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/the-matuzalem-ruling-or-why-webster-is-not-the-new-bosman.html#comment-145224 Hmmmm interesting. This will certainly set a precedent. It all makes sense though. Notice how they're backdating the interest payment too? So the actual amount is over 13 million, unless my calculations are incorrect. Which they very well may be. Hmmmm interesting. This will certainly set a precedent. It all makes sense though.

Notice how they’re backdating the interest payment too? So the actual amount is over 13 million, unless my calculations are incorrect. Which they very well may be.

]]>