Comments on: The top 100 footballers in history according to statistics

By: Mohit

Mohit — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:45:43 +0000

Hey where is fabio Cannavaro and Gianluigi buffon one of the best players from italy

By: luke

luke — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:47:16 +0000

were’s brian little?

By: javid

javid — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:45:38 +0000

it’s not that rubbish .
maybe you’re too young but i remember when the super star ronaldo was at his best in 96 and 97 ,zidane was far behind him . ronaldo was a sweet memory of maradona . he gave life to football fans – at the time he was the most famous man in the world- , zidane was charismatic and great too . he was always a star but rarely a super star .

By: mele419

mele419 — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:43:43 +0000

Crap, for the most part I’d say. There is no best player, plain and simple. Well, besides Pele. Other than that, no one can say who is better than who.

By: Musab

Musab — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:31:15 +0000

Hakan Sukur and Gheorghe Hagi in the mid 40’s, I think thats reasonable.

By: JDJ

JDJ — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:03:26 +0000

Where’s Peter Schmeichel? The man was Denmark and 50% of Manchester United in the 1990’s.

By: Laurie

Laurie — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:09:58 +0000

I cry foul at Zidane being fifth! Under Figo AND Ronaldo, no less!!

By: Ian

Ian — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:09:16 +0000

I don’t think it’s complete rubbish, but its definitely a work in progress. Putting something like footballing skill, which is as much art as science, into numbers is always going to be a tough (or maybe pointless) thing to do.

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:53:22 +0000

Cruyff only at no. 21??! Ha ha… pull another one.

By: Thierry

Thierry — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:24:45 +0000

Figo Romario, Ronaldo better than Zidane, really? I wonder sometimes if Pele was able to play in a first league nowadays, with the high physical level. In all list Garrincha is always forgotten unless for most of Brazilian he was better than Pele. And of course Arthur Friedenreich…