Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General?

By: Laurie | April 8th, 2008

yellowcard.jpgI have to admit to being a sucker for academic studies. Seriously, I’ll be reading the newspaper and see, “Study shows dogs with fleas are more likely to scratch,” and I’ll think: Wow. Really? What’s the empirical evidence? And next thing I know I’ll be reading up on their control groups.

And when these studies involve soccer? Double score. So color me ecstatic when I see a study on… Well, why don’t I just let this guy tell you about it.

“Players in European leagues who come from countries with histories of civil war are more likely to behave violently on the soccer field, as measured by the number of yellow cards (cautions) they receive.”

Or, in other words, if you grow up surrounded by violence, you’re more likely to be violent. With on-field behavior being the yardstick.

The study compares “Years of Civil War since 1980″ to “Average Number of Yellow Cards Per Player per Season” and comes up with some interesting results. (Click on the above link for the diagram.) Off the charts on both scales? Israel and Columbia.

And of course you’re thinking, but what about other variables? Things like, oh, say, “income level of home country, continent of origin, position played (defender versus mid-fielder), and age”?

All controlled for, apparently.

Here’s the Abstract from the original study:

Abstract: Can some acts of violence be explained by a society’s “culture”? Scholars have found it hard to empirically disentangle the effects of culture, legal institutions, and poverty in driving violence. We address this problem by exploiting a natural experiment offered by the presence of thousands of international soccer (football) players in the European professional leagues. We find a strong relationship between the history of civil conflict in a player’s home country and his propensity to behave violently on the soccer field, as measured by yellow and red cards. This link is robust to region fixed effects, country characteristics, and player characteristics (e.g., age, field position, market value). Reinforcing our claim that we isolate cultures of violence rather than simple rule-breaking or something else entirely, there is no meaningful correlation between a player’s home country civil war history and regular (no-card) fouls earned or goals scored.
* Corresponding

I’d be curious to hear what academic types think of this study. To me? As one commenter said, “It seems to me that if you remove Colombia and Israel the line will be flat.” An interesting idea, but does it hold true outside of these two countries? I’m not convinced. But I’m not an academic.

Thoughts?

Further reading here.




Category Category: World Football

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General? digg:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General? reddit:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General? fark:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General? Y!:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General? stumbleupon:Violent Country of Origin = More Yellow Cards = More Violent in General?

Comments  

  • From A Left Wing |  April 8th, 2008 at 10:39 am

    cornercorner

    Hi - I’ve been super into the sociology journal “Soccer and Society” which has less of these empirical equation-y things (a+b=GOAL), and more straight up history & really solid portraits of things like politically-defined women’s football teams - like a socialist women’s team in the UK. But that study, while entertaining as an idea, looks like a whole lotta bull. Probably got some crazy goverment grant.

    Posted from France France

    cornercorner
  • Steve |  April 8th, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    cornercorner

    Very interesting post. Did the guy consider the racial, cultural or patriotic biases of the officials refereeing the games?

    I studied psychology and this is the problem with so called “soft sciences” (Psychology, Sociology, etc.)… you might be able to find a correlation between two things but there are too many dynamic factors that keep us from actually empirically proving the connection between two variables.

    Either way, very interesting study and thanks for bringing it to our attention.

    Posted from Chile Chile

    cornercorner
  • Lugo |  April 8th, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    cornercorner

    Awww, crap. I knew we’d be up on this junk. Can you please show me the EXCESSIVE amount of yellow cards that ColOmbian players in Europe get to try to support this silly argument?

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners
Buy Soccer Gear

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives