<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Dose 12.05.09, now With Extra Charlize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html</link>
	<description>League Football, Soccer News and Views from Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html/comment-page-1#comment-152914</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html#comment-152914</guid>
		<description>offended? never.
I think the proper term is &#039;hypnotized.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>offended? never.<br />
I think the proper term is &#8216;hypnotized.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html/comment-page-1#comment-152902</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/weekend-dose-12-05-09-now-with-extra-charlize.html#comment-152902</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That photo looks much...bigger on the main page than it did when I posted it.  And it also seems to contain a lot more side-boob than expected.  What&#039;s funny is that I thought I picked the photo because it had the LEAST amount of skin.  

Apologies to the rare few of you who are offended.  To everyone else?  You&#039;re welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That photo looks much&#8230;bigger on the main page than it did when I posted it.  And it also seems to contain a lot more side-boob than expected.  What&#8217;s funny is that I thought I picked the photo because it had the LEAST amount of skin.  </p>
<p>Apologies to the rare few of you who are offended.  To everyone else?  You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

