Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move

By: Daryl | June 24th, 2007

TH14 signed shirtSo Thierry Henry is finally leaving Arsenal for Barcelona, and the Gunners are only getting £16 million in return. Seems like a pretty poor deal. Certainly there’s an argument to be made that losing an irreplacable player is an impossible blow to recover from, especially when he’s a fans favourite, the clubs all-time top scorer and the experienced head amidst a sea of young players.

But you could also argue that this is exactly the right move for Arsenal, as well as for Thierry Henry.


First up, Henry. He’s not getting any younger. He’s 29, and the next number after that is (consults with calculator…) 30. So if the man wants to test himself in La Liga then he has to do it now. No point going to play in Spain when he’s past his best. Henry’s given Arsenal eight fantastic years and a level of loyalty that’s not exactly Alan Knight, but still above and beyond the norm in modern football (compare Henry’s Arsenal tenure to the man he essentially replaced - Nicolas Anelka - and you’ll see what I mean.) So he’s earned the right to go and test his mettle elsewhere.

Second, Arsenal. This move could work out very nicely for them and here’s why: If a club is serious about challenging for honours - and Arsenal are serious - the they can’t rely on one player. In the last couple of seasons the burden of responsibility has increasingly fallen on Henry, a testament to his talent but not a good way to build a team. If Henry was injured or has an off day, then Arsenal struggled. Much better for the team to be build up again, with responsibility shared more equally between the players.

Just as importantly, Henry leaving puts an end to the will-he-stay-or-will-he-go stories that have unsettled things at Ashburton Grove for the last two seasons. Players and fans like to know where they stand and the constant rumours add a degree of uncertainty that’s not condusive to success. Had Henry stayed then the rumours would have reappeared in January, and again in the summer. Once he leaves, no more rumours. But also no more Henry.

Again though, Henry’s not getting any younger. Not to say he’s losing it or that he wouldn’t play like a prince in the Premiership next season, but if Wenger wanted to get a decent amount of money for his star striker then it had to be before he hit the big three-oh. £16 million may not seem much for a player this talented, but it’s more than they’d have got next summer or the one after that, and now that money can be re-invested. And who better to re-invest that money than Arsene Wenger? Star players come and go, but great manager’s define a club, which makes Wenger the Frenchman that Arsenal really need to hang onto.



The Offside Soccer ForumsTeam/International ResultsBet on Soccer games Buy Soccer TicketsTravel to soccer games


Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move digg:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move reddit:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move fark:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move Y!:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move stumbleupon:Why Selling Thierry Henry Might Be a Good Move

Comments  

  • Tall-Tale |  June 24th, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    cornercorner

    Wait a minute. Henry leaving isn’t exactly the best thing that happened to the Gunners. Henry was the face of the team, when thinking of Arsenal you dont think of Alex Hleb (who is good). Arsenal won’t finish bottom-pool this year, they still have good players in Alex Hleb, Tomas Rosicky, Freddy Ljunberg. O yes, and selling Reyes a couple of years before wasn’t the best of ideas if you knew you needed a replacement for Henry. Van Persie and Adebayor are good, and with Reyes they would have been almost very good. But now they have a problem. Theo Walcott didn’t really live up to his hype, but if you give the kid another year, he’ll be good. So if Arsenal wants honors now, do they bring in another striker like Leroy Lita or Babel (Under 21)?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • david |  June 24th, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    cornercorner

    tall tale, you have forgotten fabregas to name the obvious, along with big up and comers like clichy and denilson. van persie is more then a force to be reckoned with and now with henry gone i think he’ll really get time to shine. freddie ljunberg should go i think unless he can attain the form he had at his ealrier years with the gunners. gilberto and toure are the vets on this side now and i think its up to them along with wenger to nurture this potentially world-smashing team.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Thierry |  June 24th, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    cornercorner

    I understand the decision of henry, ultimate chance for him to discover an other club. But as a goonner, i think it’s a very poor deal 16M? i know he has a bad season, but, i’m pretty sure, he cost more than 16m. Arsenal without Henry, hum… It will not be the same.

    Posted from France France

    cornercorner
  • Inara |  June 24th, 2007 at 7:21 pm

    cornercorner

    I agree, I think 16 million pounds is on the low side. I’m sure there are a LOT of clauses in his contract, like anytime he hits the goal post, Arsenal get five dollars.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Brian |  June 25th, 2007 at 1:41 am

    cornercorner

    I’m just glad to see him go. Steven Gerrard and I still have nightmares. Cheeky bastard.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners







Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email tips[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives