<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Still Critical, But Much More Polite.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html</link>
	<description>League Football, Soccer News and Views from Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marco P.</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html/comment-page-1#comment-137735</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html#comment-137735</guid>
		<description>You know, as entertaining as they may be, it is just too easy to manufacture these &quot;edited wiki entries&quot; news pieces. Not accusing you of anything Chris, but you said so yourself: &quot;don&#039;t screenshot your own doings&quot;. You&#039;re running a serious risk that in fact, &lt;i&gt;The Offside&lt;/i&gt; mailbox will only get flooded with these.

So ultimately I think, the sheer entertainment value will have to come from the author&#039;s originality at editing, and his (colourful) language selection. Hoping to see something more creative than &quot;garbage&quot;, &quot;shite&quot;, and &quot;fu** off you useless piece of ****&quot; in the future... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, as entertaining as they may be, it is just too easy to manufacture these &#8220;edited wiki entries&#8221; news pieces. Not accusing you of anything Chris, but you said so yourself: &#8220;don&#8217;t screenshot your own doings&#8221;. You&#8217;re running a serious risk that in fact, <i>The Offside</i> mailbox will only get flooded with these.</p>
<p>So ultimately I think, the sheer entertainment value will have to come from the author&#8217;s originality at editing, and his (colourful) language selection. Hoping to see something more creative than &#8220;garbage&#8221;, &#8220;shite&#8221;, and &#8220;fu** off you useless piece of ****&#8221; in the future&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ibracadabra</title>
		<link>http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html/comment-page-1#comment-137734</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibracadabra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/wikipedia-still-critical-but-much-more-polite.html#comment-137734</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s brilliant, almost as good as the greatest footie related wikipedia search ever when I found out that frank ribery&#039;s favorite movie growing up was &quot;Scarface&quot; listed under his personal life for about a month during world cup 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s brilliant, almost as good as the greatest footie related wikipedia search ever when I found out that frank ribery&#8217;s favorite movie growing up was &#8220;Scarface&#8221; listed under his personal life for about a month during world cup 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

