Yet Another Reason Football Club Tattoos Aren’t Brilliant

By: chris | April 7th, 2009

It’s your standard internet chat room pedophile story: an 18 year old buck asks younger girls to take their clothes off on webcam. Eventually some younger girls take the bait and off come the clothes, only to find out 18 year old guy is really creepy 41 year old dude. (No faith in today’s youth. None, I tell you.)

Given that the perv used a fake name/profile and ISP, presumably, they had to track down this “Paul Wilson”.

“Paul Wilson”, whose real name is Paul Quinn, did two really stupid things:

i. He got a football club tattoo for a club – Celtic are the ones lucky enough to be aligned with Pauly boy – he, presumably, never played for.
ii. He bragged about the tattoo to the girls.

And how did they catch him, you ask? With that very distinctive Celtic FC tattoo, of course. And along with that tattoo they found 85 lewd videos and 500+ photos of girls young enough that I really would rather not say. Somewhere around this Paul’s IQ should suffice.

All that will land Paul a six-year sentence with a permanent reminder that nothing good ever came out of a football club tattoo. Though even he could teach Ezequiel Lavezi a thing or two. (About tattoos, not the other one.)

	Soccer Forums	Team/International Results

Category: World Football

Tags: Celtic, internet, pedophile, tattoo, World Football

« Sunday League Backpassing With Bruno Alves… | Home | Daily Dose: April 7th, 2009 »

Subscribe   The Offside RSS Feeds

Print

Share

Comments  

• Mike |  April 7th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

  
  
  

  Damn. I guess I shouldn’t have gotten Pato’s face tattooed across my…
  nevermind.

  Posted from United States

  

• LilacWine |  April 7th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

  
  
  

  Shouldn’t we be pleased that perverts are dumb enough to brand themselves into easy recognition, instead of lamenting that they were silly enough to get a football tattoo and then using that to further your case against said tattoos?
  Sure, football tattoos aren’t brilliant, but in this case they turned out to be quite useful.

  Posted from Canada

  

• Ian |  April 8th, 2009 at 8:52 am

  
  
  

  Let’s not blame the tattoo here. The tattoo didn’t make him a pedophile. I’m with LilacWine – the tattoo was a useful tool in ID-ing him. I don’t know if I’d ever get a club tattoo, but I have a Scotland tat, and if I every do anything 1 millionth this awful, I hope they can ID me by it and put my ass in jail.

  Posted from United States

  

Comments are closed